Denied, Due to undisclosed sealed arrest, Should I file a Motion to Reconsider?

intokable21

New Member
My father is the petitioner (employer based), and right now the I-485 is for both of my parents, my brother, and me in NYS. My DOB is 7/1986. We have all had the EAD card for a few years now.

I was arrested as a minor (17 years old) in 6/04, for petit larceny, and the judge told me as long as i did not get arrested for a year, the case would be sealed. I was arrested in 9/05 (19 years old), for petit larceny, and the judge told me as long as I didn't get arrested within 6 months, the case would be sealed. It didn't become sealed until 4/06. My first I-485 interview was in 1/06, I was the first one in my family to be scheduled, and the agent at Federal Plaza told me my father had to be called first, so they arranged a family interview for 5/17/06.

At the interview 5/17/06, with all four of us plus our lawyer present, they asked me two questions pertaining my criminal past.
1) Have you comitted a crime that the police does not know about?
NO
2) Have you ever been arrested?
I said NO, on advice from my lawyer, on grounds that the case was sealed and the lawyer thought it would not appear on the background check.
I thought the interview had gone very well, the agent was freindly, and we asked alot of quesitons at the end. She said "security clearance had been completed." and that everything looked good, but her supervisor had to look over the file to make sure everything was in order. So we left feeling confident.

On 5/20/06 I received a letter (with the date of 5/17/06, same day as interview) stating I had been denied for adjustment of status, due to misrepresentation about my arrest. The letter states that I had a several opportunities to come clean. It states the date of my arrest, the charge, and location (the arrest as an adult.) The arrest as a minor is not stated on the letter.

It says I can't appeal, just file a motion to reconsider or to a motion to reopen. Looking back at the timeline I believe this is what happened:
TIMELINE​
FIRST INTERVIEW (1/06): 9/05 Petit Larceny case was not sealed as of yet. Background check at this point would have come up with this charge.
CASE SEALED (4/06): Now the case is sealed, and I went to get disposition the same week.
SECOND INTERVIEW (5/06): My father and brother had went for their fingerprints 2-3 weeks prior to the interview, my mother and I had gone in 12/05. I think they kept the same background check from the first interview, I don't think they did a new one, because the sealed case should not have come up.



MY QUESTIONS
1) Should I file a motion? Which one?
2) What is the point of sealing cases? Are they truly sealed, with no one having access to it? Or do they have access to it, but they have to disregard it? Would sealed cases appear on any background check?
3) Should I bring up my arrest when I was a minor? That case is sealed, and I also have the disposition. Is it possible that they the arrest as a minor came up, but they are withholding that from me? like they did with the arrest as an adult at the interview?
4) Was USCIS interviewer right in not questioning me about my arrest, if she had the background check in front of her? Why would she say all security clearances had been completed?
5) I blame this on my lawyer. The first interview and after that, the plan was to disclose the adult arrest, but not the arrest as a minor. The morning of the interview 5/17/06 , he said he talked to another lawyer, and they agreed not to disclose the information about my arrest because it was sealed and it might jeopardize me, so the plan changed to me not disclosing my arrest, even though I had the disposition with me.
Is there anything I can do to blame my lawyer? Would he get in trouble, like have his license revoked? Would USCIS accept this as a valid reason?
6) I have a USC fiancee, and he is the father of our USC 2 year old daughter. We would have been married 3 years ago, but the lawyer said doing that would throw away our whole case, and that it was better to wait it out.
What would happen if I marry him now? Would that make it worse or easier? Should I marry him now or wait? Should I point this out (2 USC-fiancee & daughter) in the Motion?
7) In case they still reject/ deny my application, will this hinder or hurt my parents/ brother in their application? Is there anything I can do so that it does not hurt their chances?
8)Look at the TIMELINE, does it seem like that is what likely happened?
9) My brother was arrested in the summer of 2005, for public urination and marijuana possesion. He did not get a letter yet, but I believe its because his background check is still in progress. It is already sealed, and he does have the disposition. Will he get the letter too?

Thank you
 
intokable21 said:
2) Have you ever been arrested?I said NO, on advice from my lawyer, on grounds that the case was sealed and the lawyer thought it would not appear on the background check.

There you go - you lied under oath. They didn't ask you wether you were convicted, or wether the arrest was sealed or not. They simply and quite deliberately asked you if you had ever been arrested. You said something that you knew was not true.

What is the point of sealing cases? Are they truly sealed, with no one having access to it? Or do they have access to it, but they have to disregard it? Would sealed cases appear on any background check?

You'd be amazed as to what information USCIS and DHS have access to. The rule of thumb is that you ALWAYS admit to any arrests in the US, since they WILL be available to DHS.

Was USCIS interviewer right in not questioning me about my arrest, if she had the background check in front of her? Why would she say all security clearances had been completed?

She can ask you (or not ask you) whatever she wants.

they agreed not to disclose the information about my arrest because it was sealed and it might jeopardize me, so the plan changed to me not disclosing my arrest, even though I had the disposition with me.

Then your attorney is an incompetent moron. If he had half a brain he would determine IN ADVANCE wether your criminal activity made you inadmissible, and if it did not then there would be no problem admitting to it. As it stands, he counseled you to lie to USCIS (bad) and you went along with it (worse).

Is there anything I can do to blame my lawyer? Would he get in trouble, like have his license revoked? Would USCIS accept this as a valid reason?

Look in the mirror. Ultimately, you were under oath, and you lied. The attorney deserves a fair share of blame in this, but at the end of the day you lied under oath. The responsibility is yours, just like your repeated arrests.

Would that make it worse or easier? Should I marry him now or wait? Should I point this out (2 USC-fiancee & daughter) in the Motion?

You engaged in deliberate misreprenstation in order to obtain an immigration benefit. In my understanding, that makes you permanently inadmissible without the possibility of waiver.

In case they still reject/ deny my application, will this hinder or hurt my parents/ brother in their application? Is there anything I can do so that it does not hurt their chances?

You can't affect them, unless you get them to start lying for you.

My brother was arrested in the summer of 2005, for public urination and marijuana possesion. He did not get a letter yet, but I believe its because his background check is still in progress. It is already sealed, and he does have the disposition. Will he get the letter too?

I can't recall wether marijuana makes one inadmissible. It's a drug offense, so there's a good chance it will. You might want to find yourselves a real attorney instead of the fool you have now to see if anything can be done to save yourselves, but based on your family's apparent inability to follow the law I am doubtful.
 
forget about what happened in the past about your criminal history and forget about the denial of I-485 as a derivative applicant. Get married right now and file a new application and of course disclose everything in the past even if the cases were declared to be sealed. Sealed or expunged cases were never be actually sealed before the law enforcement agencies as they can just simply run a finger print and find out what happened, so an actual disclosure of everything is a must on the I-485 application.

File a motion to reopen in this case is just a waste of time and money, because you will only get 50/50 chance here and mostly USCIS will deny your motion on the ground that you misrepresent your case. If you take a close look at fine prints at the bottom of I-485 application form you will get an idea why they denied your case. Filing a new I-485 application based on the marriage you may get pardoned. Of course you have to mention the criminal history as well as the denial of previous I-485 case etc.

Blaming your attorney for whatever reason won't help you anything as he/she will never admit his/her action. I suggest you get a new immigration attorney who is quite familiar with both immigration and criminal matter. Your case will turn either way if you do or don't get a good attorney. Your case is in your hands right now. So please do something and of course good attorney won't be cheap.
 
buzzhd said:
forget about what happened in the past about your criminal history and forget about the denial of I-485 as a derivative applicant. Get married right now and file a new application and of course disclose everything in the past even if the cases were declared to be sealed.

That won't get around the fact that she lied under oath in order to obtain an immigration benefit. That's a serious no-no that IIRC has no waiver.
 
yes, I know this is a tough case for her especially with two offenses at her age of 17 as minor and 19 (don't know if this was a case as a minor), but just want to give her some light at the end of tunnel if we can :) .

Get and consult your good attorney and see if you have the case..

Being lied to USCIS is indeed a very serious matter that will result in denial of all immigration benefits in the future.
 
if sooner or later she and her brother get GCs, the story will be very nice for antiimmigrants. They will say: look who are these immigrants, they were stealing when they were minor, they were stealing as adults, they urinate in public and have marijuana in their pockets. Should we welcome them to our country?
 
nice comment dima, but your response was irrelevant to my question. i am assuming you are righteous, and you never ever broke a law or committed a sin. You should go to Congress, and put to law to take away citizenship from all the criminals in jail, detention houses, hell even group homes.

by the way, you are missing a 6 in ur name, you beast
 
nice comment dima, but your response was irrelevant to my question. i am assuming you are righteous, and you never ever broke a law or committed a sin. :rolleyes: You should go to Congress, and put to law to take away citizenship from all the criminals in jail, detention houses, hell even group homes.

by the way, you are missing a 6 in ur name, you beast ;)
 
intokable21 said:
nice comment dima, but your response was irrelevant to my question. i am assuming you are righteous, and you never ever broke a law or committed a sin. You should go to Congress, and put to law to take away citizenship from all the criminals in jail, detention houses, hell even group homes.

His comment is valid. You are a convicted criminal who lied under oath. We are not.

As far as deporting everybody convicted - they are citizens - they do not have other citizenship and no were to go, unfortunately. You have another citizenship - that country will sure welcome you back, whatever you past history was.
 
intokable21

I came here from the country where everybody urinates on the streets and stealing is more respectful than job. I didn't want to live there, and I don't want the US become like that.
 
Top