Hi,
I wonder whether any people on this list can give me some advice on my
case. From you opinion, how about the chance of approval if I submit
the required evidence?
I applied for eb-1b (OR) to the CSC INS in the middle of this
January. And I just got a RFE letter from INS last week. In the letter
it is said:
"The petition has been reviewed and has been found to be deficient....
please submit evidence that addresses the deficiencies below:
(1) the significance of the beneficiary\'s awards has not been established
..... please submit evidence to establish the origin, purpose.....
I got two (minor) awards from IEEE and ACM in the form
of student travel grants. Those are used to sponse a Ph.D student to
attend IEEE/ACM conference. I don\'t know whether they are counted.
(2) provide the minimum requirements and crieria of membership.....
I am memembers of both IEEE and ACM. Will that count?
(3) provide evidence to establish the significance of the published
material submitted about the beneficiary\'s work, as an individual, and
how it demonstrates international recognition for outstanding
achievement compared to others in their academic field. Indicate the
publication\'s name; if it has local, national, or international
circulation; how often it is printed; and the number of copies printed.
I obtained my Ph.D in 2000. I have 10 published pagers,
technical reports, release software, etc. I have also one pending
patent. There are more than 25 citations on my work.
(4) provide evidence that the beneficiary has at least three years of
experience in teaching and/or research in the academic field.....
I submitted my resume to INS. And I also asked my Ph.D
advisor to write a recommendation letter in which he stated that I
have been doing research with him from 1995-2000.
Ok, that is all. I wonder whether some one can shed some light on my case
and give me some suggestion on how to deal with the RFE? And from your
understanding, what would be my chance to get approved if I submitted the
above required evidence?
Moreover, as we understand, it is not necessary for an applicant to
satisfy all the 6 aspects required by INS. 2 or more should be fine.
So, based on my following qualification, how about my chance?
Here is my qualification:
-Ph.D in Computer Science
-10+ published materials, one pending patent
-25+ citation to my work
-reviewed lots of other scholar\'s work/paper and current in the review
committe of an internation journal
-did summer research intern in different industrial research labs.
-2 (minor) awards: travel grants for attending IEEE/ACM conferences
Thank you very much in advance!
-csc-eb1b
I wonder whether any people on this list can give me some advice on my
case. From you opinion, how about the chance of approval if I submit
the required evidence?
I applied for eb-1b (OR) to the CSC INS in the middle of this
January. And I just got a RFE letter from INS last week. In the letter
it is said:
"The petition has been reviewed and has been found to be deficient....
please submit evidence that addresses the deficiencies below:
(1) the significance of the beneficiary\'s awards has not been established
..... please submit evidence to establish the origin, purpose.....
I got two (minor) awards from IEEE and ACM in the form
of student travel grants. Those are used to sponse a Ph.D student to
attend IEEE/ACM conference. I don\'t know whether they are counted.
(2) provide the minimum requirements and crieria of membership.....
I am memembers of both IEEE and ACM. Will that count?
(3) provide evidence to establish the significance of the published
material submitted about the beneficiary\'s work, as an individual, and
how it demonstrates international recognition for outstanding
achievement compared to others in their academic field. Indicate the
publication\'s name; if it has local, national, or international
circulation; how often it is printed; and the number of copies printed.
I obtained my Ph.D in 2000. I have 10 published pagers,
technical reports, release software, etc. I have also one pending
patent. There are more than 25 citations on my work.
(4) provide evidence that the beneficiary has at least three years of
experience in teaching and/or research in the academic field.....
I submitted my resume to INS. And I also asked my Ph.D
advisor to write a recommendation letter in which he stated that I
have been doing research with him from 1995-2000.
Ok, that is all. I wonder whether some one can shed some light on my case
and give me some suggestion on how to deal with the RFE? And from your
understanding, what would be my chance to get approved if I submitted the
above required evidence?
Moreover, as we understand, it is not necessary for an applicant to
satisfy all the 6 aspects required by INS. 2 or more should be fine.
So, based on my following qualification, how about my chance?
Here is my qualification:
-Ph.D in Computer Science
-10+ published materials, one pending patent
-25+ citation to my work
-reviewed lots of other scholar\'s work/paper and current in the review
committe of an internation journal
-did summer research intern in different industrial research labs.
-2 (minor) awards: travel grants for attending IEEE/ACM conferences
Thank you very much in advance!
-csc-eb1b