NoJob, from where are you getting information like this? As far as I know H.R. 4477
"To authorize Federal judges to carry firearms." may be you are talking about H.R. 4437 which again as far as I know is practically dead. It is a bill from House and not a report.
The senate doesn't change sections of a House bill. Amendments can be made as additions and the bill is generally taken up for voting. If Senate has an equivalent bill then both houses in a conference reconcile any differences in the two bills, in immigration case, this conference never happened.
>and I base it on the lengthy 484 page H.R. 4477 report that is in the Senate for changing sections 609, 610, 612... etc, where at present if you applying for Citizenship after 5 years, the law looks for Good Moral character. It's been argued that 5 years should be good time frame for CIS to judge Good Moral character. The H.R. 4477 is asking the governement to enact that allows CIS to go past 5 yrs if they wish to. Well, from this, I take it that they are interested in the US history.
"To authorize Federal judges to carry firearms." may be you are talking about H.R. 4437 which again as far as I know is practically dead. It is a bill from House and not a report.
The senate doesn't change sections of a House bill. Amendments can be made as additions and the bill is generally taken up for voting. If Senate has an equivalent bill then both houses in a conference reconcile any differences in the two bills, in immigration case, this conference never happened.
>and I base it on the lengthy 484 page H.R. 4477 report that is in the Senate for changing sections 609, 610, 612... etc, where at present if you applying for Citizenship after 5 years, the law looks for Good Moral character. It's been argued that 5 years should be good time frame for CIS to judge Good Moral character. The H.R. 4477 is asking the governement to enact that allows CIS to go past 5 yrs if they wish to. Well, from this, I take it that they are interested in the US history.