Convincing company not to revoke I-140

B

berrybird

Registered Users (C)
Guys,

I was wondering if people had any thoughts on what the best approach is to ask a company not to revoke an approved I-140 ?

The assumption here is that you would have left the company on good terms but you want something legally accurate to convince them they are not doing anything wrong (or are they ?)

If one is AC21 eligible and suddenly gets layed off the NOID procedure in the latest memo gives only < 30 days to find a new job and respond which is quite scary.


BB
 
Yes, it is difficult to convince an employer who can substitute somebody else in your LC/I140 place and get GC for that person. Company will not lose anything by revoking the I140.
 
Our company attorney convinced my employer in similar way.. What he said was it statutory requirement employer is required revoke H1 but not the I-140.
 
if I-485 is pending more than I80 days

then you do not need to worry abt I-140 revocation by ur employer bcos, it does not aftect ur GC processing since 180 days has been passed.
 
If you still want to have a peace of mind,try to get a letter from your Employer that they will support your application Permanent Residency ...indirectly you are taking in writing that they will not revoke I-140 and this might bind them morally to a certain extent,although whatever u do, the employers can always revoke your I-140.
 
Not sure why people are still scared of revoking I-140...

pls take a look at the new memo posted on Murthy ..

http://murthy.com/UDportme.html

this clearly says 'even if I-140 is revoked the 485 has to be processed and approved unless it is a case of Fraudulence"
 
Originally posted by BigBuddy
Not sure why people are still scared of revoking I-140...

pls take a look at the new memo posted on Murthy ..

http://murthy.com/UDportme.html

this clearly says 'even if I-140 is revoked the 485 has to be processed and approved unless it is a case of Fraudulence"
Click to expand...

.. provided the revocation happened after 180 days of I-485 application.

I think people are more worried about INS' incompetent handling of these cases and denying GCs based on lack of understanding of the AC21 rule. There had been cases posted in this forum and the hassles one has to go thru to undo the damage is horrific.
 
This recent memo posted on Murthy.com is to remove these kind of confusions where the INS top guy wants unformity on AC21 in all centers and thats why this kind of memo to all the INS centers..

but is there any way to screw these kind of employers who are trying to take undue advantage of the legal loopholes?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top