Centralization of Family based applications. God help us before they do this for 485’

If this happens to 485’s I am sure the processing will be paralyzed for several weeks/months before they get on track.
From immigration-law.com
05/06/2003: New Chapter of Green Card Application Processing: Centralization
· Currently, I-485 application with the ancillary applications such as I-765 EAD application and I-131 advance parole for employment-based immigration is regionalized into the four Service Centers (California, Nebraska, Texas, and Vermont) and no in-person filing is available. Accordingly, there is no direct human interaction between the government agency and the applicants. Everything is handled by mail.
· Until now, the family-based I-485 application with the ancillary applications (I-765 and I-131) is filed with the BCIS district offices in the local areas. In most cases, the applications are filed in person rather than by mail. The current system allows the human interaction between the agency and the applicants. Soon this system will disappear.
· BCIS will eliminate the direct in-person filing system and require the family-based green card applications to be filed by mail only. These applications will be filed not with the local district offices but with the Missouri Service Center which will soon be renamed as National Benefits Center (NBC).
· One benefit of centralization of family-based green card applications and ancillary applications is realization of uniformity in the processing times and removal of inconsistent local practices, leading to achievement of some level of fairness and consistency among the applicants living in 50 different states. As people know, currently there is a huge discrepancy in the local district practices and processing times. Along with this benefit will come disappearance of long waiting line of people in the local district offices. Currently people have to wait in the freezing cold outside the building in some areas. Even if they are successful in getting into the building, they are required to sit and wait for hours to file applications.
· One drawback of centralization is unavailability of immediate issuance of EAD and Advance Parole at the time of filing at the local district offices. Without doubt, BCIS may arrange issuance of such documents at local district offices in "emergency" cases, but generally the same day issuance of EAD and Advance Parole will disappear and these applications will take time to be processed and adjudicated by the NBC.
· The new procedure will also bring a substantial change in immigration law practice for the immigration lawyers. Along with the centralization of the family-based green card applications will come nationalization of such immigration law practice just like employment-based immigration law practice. In the employment-based immigration law practice, launch of PERM program will gradually remove involvement of the state agencies and processing of the labor certification will be completely centralized removing the current local or regional variations and differences. Since there will no longer be the need for understanding of the local practice in the labor certification proceedings, the location of the legal counsel will become totally irrelevant. Even though there will be some difference in the family-based immigration, the centralization of the family-based green card application processing will tear down the local and regional barriers in the immigration law practice and the location of the legal counsel will become not relevant. Consequently, the local practice will be narrowed to the legal proceedings related to immigration enforcement proceedings, such as problem that arises from immigration inspection process, criminal investigation of immigration violators, illegal alien removal proceedings, immigration court proceedings, etc.
· The timeline of the new procedure is known to be around June 2003. The new chapter of immigration law practice in immigration history is about to open and we look forward to the new challenge ahead.
 
Originally posted by tru
If this happens to 485’s I am sure the processing will be paralyzed for several weeks/months before they get on track.

Huh? They're already doing this with employment-based I-485s! You don't file your I-485 at a District Office, you file with one of the Service Centers. All this is talking about is making the FB folks file their I-485s at MSC, instead of at the local offices.

This is *GREAT* news for those of us waiting for local interviews.
 
reply

Should have been more clear. I meant that if they move all the existing 485's to some centralized location then we would be screwed for weeks/months. Did not mean the new ones.
 
Help me here. Does this impact 485 EB. Other than the general snafu this may bring up in the service centers because of some admin stuff.

Hope our 485 EB will not be lost somwhere in this melee.
 
Re: reply

Originally posted by tru
Should have been more clear. I meant that if they move all the existing 485's to some centralized location then we would be screwed for weeks/months. Did not mean the new ones.

But your I-485s are already in a central location - TSC.

Let's repeat: this has ABSOLUTELY ZERO EFFECT for EB-485 filers, unless your case has been transferred. In which case, it's a good thing.

Be happy!
 
reply

I interpreted from this sentence:
· BCIS will eliminate the direct in-person filing system and require the family-based green card applications to be filed by mail only. These applications will be filed not with the local district offices but with the Missouri Service Center which will soon be renamed as National Benefits Center (NBC).

Yes currently our files are in a central location TSC. What I meant was if they try moving the 485 files to Missouri and adjudicate it there then there would be a lot of confusion. Hopefully that does not happen.
 
Re: reply

Originally posted by tru
Yes currently our files are in a central location TSC. What I meant was if they try moving the 485 files to Missouri and adjudicate it there then there would be a lot of confusion. Hopefully that does not happen.

Why would they do that?? The explicit purpose of this is to handle FB cases the same way they handle EB cases. Nothing is going to change.
 
Top