To maintain you Canadian PR, I believe you must stay in Canada a minimum of 6 months during a year. I heard a rumor that the rule has now changed. The rumor is that in a 5 year given period you must stay in Canada for atleast 2 years. Is this true ? Does any one have a confirmed news about this ?
- Home
- Forums
- Other Countries - Visiting, Living in, Moving to o
- Canada - Visiting, Living in, Moving to or Moving
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Canadian PR Minimum Stay Rule Changed ???
- Thread starter silver
- Start date
No Title
Hi rana1982,
This was told to me by a friend. This rumour is obviously not in any website. I tried to find this, but could not find any website related to this news. I too wish this news is true.
Hi rana1982,
This was told to me by a friend. This rumour is obviously not in any website. I tried to find this, but could not find any website related to this news. I too wish this news is true.
No Title
Seems like the 2 years requirement is true. Check this lawyer Website
for details
http://www.canadavisa.com/documents/changes.htm
Seems like the 2 years requirement is true. Check this lawyer Website
for details
http://www.canadavisa.com/documents/changes.htm
Indu Verma
Registered Users (C)
No Title
Hi
I have visited the site www.canadavisa.com/documents/changes
I tried to verify this thing from the Telephone # given in the page,they says that i must enquire this Query from the Canadian Bar Association Tel# is 514 393 9600
Hi
I have visited the site www.canadavisa.com/documents/changes
I tried to verify this thing from the Telephone # given in the page,they says that i must enquire this Query from the Canadian Bar Association Tel# is 514 393 9600
No Title
You can go through www.cic.gc.ca, the Canadian immigration site for government. They posted a news (Nee Release, Feb 21)mentioning that it\'s already approved and become an Act.
Good Luck Everybody.
You can go through www.cic.gc.ca, the Canadian immigration site for government. They posted a news (Nee Release, Feb 21)mentioning that it\'s already approved and become an Act.
Good Luck Everybody.
No Title
David, proving a fact in the legal system is all about the evidence. So, if one can prove by evidence that person was residing in the country by factual info, such as, payment of taxes, having a property where one resides, having financial activities,etc. These will considered that on one was intact a resident and that this point will be acceptable in the court of law. In my view one can go by these and still be virtually in the country while in fact I/he is not. However, moving on to the ammedment in the law question at hand. This may require other facts, which will go beyond the above. I don\'t what they will be. Perhaps, the only thing I could think of strict border control measures that make sure one would get entry and exit stamp whenever I/he crosses the border.
David, proving a fact in the legal system is all about the evidence. So, if one can prove by evidence that person was residing in the country by factual info, such as, payment of taxes, having a property where one resides, having financial activities,etc. These will considered that on one was intact a resident and that this point will be acceptable in the court of law. In my view one can go by these and still be virtually in the country while in fact I/he is not. However, moving on to the ammedment in the law question at hand. This may require other facts, which will go beyond the above. I don\'t what they will be. Perhaps, the only thing I could think of strict border control measures that make sure one would get entry and exit stamp whenever I/he crosses the border.