Can a person stay 2 yrs in Canada, 6 yrs outside, and 2 yrs again

gc_ka_diwaana

Registered Users (C)
Interested friends keep on asking this question -
The 2/5 yr rules states that a person can stay for 3 yrs outside canada in any 5 year period.
Does this mean that
a) an applicant gets his PR in 2005. From 2005 - 2007, he stays in Canada
b) From 2007 - 2013 - he stays outside Canada - thus staying 3 year outside Canada for the first period and another 3 years outside Canada for the second period
c) From 2013 onwards - he returns and stays in Canada until 2015.

Is this possible
 
I don't think this is possible because 2/5 year rule said need to stay 2 year in 5 year, It does not mean 4/10 or 6/15.
According to me in continuous 5 year time, person should be there for 2 year for any point of time.
 
I think gc_ka_diwaana is right.

You just have to stay 2 years in 5 years. After that you can again repeat the same for as long as you want.

Others please shed some more light on it........
 
The 2/5 rule allows you to stay outside for a continuous period of upto 3 years. After that contnuous absence of 3 years in a total of 5 year period, you are expected to maintain residency again, for at least a day. This will, in theory, reset your 2/5 clock. You can then try living outside for another 3 years and then come back and fulfill the residency obligations by living inside for the remainder of 1 year and 364 days :)

If you continue to stay outside beyond 3 years, you would be considered as to have given up intent on living in Canada irrespective of what your intent might be in another 3 years.

Hope this helps.
 
Can someone clear that what is the rule for maintaining PR status if I do not want to apply for citizenship and Just want to maintain PR Status. I think 2 out of 5 is the rule for citizenship.
 
the rule

I am not certain, but I think the way the rule is to be interpreted is:
a person has to stay in Canada for a period of at least 2 years in ANY 5 year period - as this is a rolling mechanism, on day 1 of the 6th year, the first day of PR will not be considered.
So basically, a trailing 5-year system and not blocks of 5-year periods.
Satish
 
the law on the issue

criteria to assess a person's right to retain permanent resident status when they wish to return to Canada following an absence. Under Bill C-11, the residency obligation replaces a vague, highly subjective and easy to abuse test in the current Act which is based on an evaluation of the intention of a person to abandon Canada as a place of residence if they have been outside Canada for more than 183 days in any 12 month period. Under C- 11, permanent residents would be required to be physically present in Canada for at least 730 days in every five-year period after becoming a permanent resident. The proposed legislation would allow a permanent resident to count, as part of the required 730 days, time spent working abroad in certain circumstances such as working for a Canadian company or the Canadian government or accompanying their Canadian spouse or common-law partner. This would allow permanent residents a degree of flexibility over their personal or business affairs that is necessary in a world where routine international travel, work periods abroad and multinational business ties are becoming commonplace.
Guys,
Please read the snippet below-it answers the initial question completely.

"The period under review when assessing the residency obligation is limited to the last five years immediately preceding the examination for persons who have been a permanent resident for at least five years. For persons who have been permanent residents for less than 5 years, the test is that they be able to comply with their residency obligation in respect of the five year period immdiately after becoming a permanent resident. Humanitarian and compassionate considerations, which take into account the best interests of affected children, will be carefully reviewed before any loss of residency decisions are rendered for failure to satisfy the residency obligation. This is new as the current Act only allows for humanitarian considerations to be reviewed during an appeal but not during the initial loss of status determination. Bill C-11also provides for an oral appeal to the Immigration Appeal Division of all IRB decisions regarding failure to meet the residency obligation. This includes consideration of any humanitarian and compassionate circumstances and is subject to judicial review by the Federal Court."
Satish.
 
Top