Hi, I am in the US on L1B status and my Visa is valid until 2011, My same sex partner got his B2 Visa at the same time I got my L1B.
We first arrived in the USA on Apr/08/2008, and he has applied for an extension in September 2008 and was granted a 6 months extension.
So we have pretty much been in the US for 12 months now. Obviously I would hope he can accompany me for the duration of my L1B until 2011.
We went back to visit the family in UK in March 2009 for 10 days, upon re-entering US, the immegration told my partner that he did not stay outside the US for long enough and after a long debate, granted him another 6 months stay.
But all this had been put on the record, and they told him he may have problem try to extend his stay yet again in 6 months time.
Is there any grounds for them to make such claims? I understand genreally B2 is only allowed a maximum of 12 months stay, but didn't the state goverment issue a classification for B2:
travel.state.gov/visa/laws/telegrams/telegrams_1414.html
Which to me seems to read that for accompany partner on work visa, longer stay should be granted?
That classification is intended for consular posts, does that mena the port immegration office does not need to take it into consideration - in other words, 2 sets of standards?
It would seem stupid to not allow extended stay for visitors with their working visa partners? If I'd known this I probably won't have taken up the work post!
So, my question is
- is it likely my partner will be denied extention.
- any way around it?
Thanks
We first arrived in the USA on Apr/08/2008, and he has applied for an extension in September 2008 and was granted a 6 months extension.
So we have pretty much been in the US for 12 months now. Obviously I would hope he can accompany me for the duration of my L1B until 2011.
We went back to visit the family in UK in March 2009 for 10 days, upon re-entering US, the immegration told my partner that he did not stay outside the US for long enough and after a long debate, granted him another 6 months stay.
But all this had been put on the record, and they told him he may have problem try to extend his stay yet again in 6 months time.
Is there any grounds for them to make such claims? I understand genreally B2 is only allowed a maximum of 12 months stay, but didn't the state goverment issue a classification for B2:
travel.state.gov/visa/laws/telegrams/telegrams_1414.html
Which to me seems to read that for accompany partner on work visa, longer stay should be granted?
That classification is intended for consular posts, does that mena the port immegration office does not need to take it into consideration - in other words, 2 sets of standards?
It would seem stupid to not allow extended stay for visitors with their working visa partners? If I'd known this I probably won't have taken up the work post!
So, my question is
- is it likely my partner will be denied extention.
- any way around it?
Thanks