Hi,
I was reading curiosGeorge's TN to GC post. I noticed he wrote the following about his case.
"My lawyer filed to renew my TN via mail (...). A few weeks later in April of 2002, he filed my I-485, EAD's and AP's for both my wife and I. (...) My first EAD's and AP's arrived in May 2002, and then my 5th TN renewal arrived in June 2002."
So looks like the fact that the applicant filed an AOS was not a problem since there was no AOS application when TN extension was filed. Do I understand this correctly? USCIS should have known about the AOS application while approving the TN extension application. Can we say that USCIS has to consider only the facts as of the date of the application and ignore the subsequent developments?
If this is true, I plan to extend my TN with regular processing just before filing my AOS to save time and money. I believe my TN extension application has a low chance of denial unless AOS application will be problem.
Thanks
I was reading curiosGeorge's TN to GC post. I noticed he wrote the following about his case.
"My lawyer filed to renew my TN via mail (...). A few weeks later in April of 2002, he filed my I-485, EAD's and AP's for both my wife and I. (...) My first EAD's and AP's arrived in May 2002, and then my 5th TN renewal arrived in June 2002."
So looks like the fact that the applicant filed an AOS was not a problem since there was no AOS application when TN extension was filed. Do I understand this correctly? USCIS should have known about the AOS application while approving the TN extension application. Can we say that USCIS has to consider only the facts as of the date of the application and ignore the subsequent developments?
If this is true, I plan to extend my TN with regular processing just before filing my AOS to save time and money. I believe my TN extension application has a low chance of denial unless AOS application will be problem.
Thanks