poongunranar
Registered Users (C)
Good Optimistic News !!
Dear Friends:
Whenever I indite certain viewpoints they are strictly based on the rules and statutes that I am aware of, corroborating with other credible hearsay information, as well as first-hand knowledge on certain adverse outcomes. That much said, I do not want many of you to go under panic mode. In fact, I have responded to many of you privately about certain other cases which I know of having gotten their approvals in absentia, even as I await one pending adjudication of my friend in VSC.
Now, I wish to share one private message from a friend in this forum where the case was approved in absentia. For the sake of their privacy, I will remove their identity and other specific details. I have also posted my response to them.
The bottom-line, I want all of you to know is that, exceptions do occur and it is good that they do occur! However, let us be more careful in flippantly taking decisions in future. I also wish all of you not to go under panic mode and be cheerful and optimistic to cross the bridge as it comes:
My Response:
Dear Friends:
Whenever I indite certain viewpoints they are strictly based on the rules and statutes that I am aware of, corroborating with other credible hearsay information, as well as first-hand knowledge on certain adverse outcomes. That much said, I do not want many of you to go under panic mode. In fact, I have responded to many of you privately about certain other cases which I know of having gotten their approvals in absentia, even as I await one pending adjudication of my friend in VSC.
Now, I wish to share one private message from a friend in this forum where the case was approved in absentia. For the sake of their privacy, I will remove their identity and other specific details. I have also posted my response to them.
The bottom-line, I want all of you to know is that, exceptions do occur and it is good that they do occur! However, let us be more careful in flippantly taking decisions in future. I also wish all of you not to go under panic mode and be cheerful and optimistic to cross the bridge as it comes:
Dear poongunranar
Please help
I give below the facts regarding renewal of our Advance Parole :
1. My wife went to India on XX Aug 2003 on the original AP that was valid from XX Feb 2003 to XX Feb 2004. I went to India on XX Oct 2003 on the original AP that was valid from XX Feb 2003 to XX Feb 2004. I had filed renewal of our APs on XX Oct 2003 prior to my departure to India. Please note that my wife was not here when I filed for her extension.
2.Both of us returned to USA using our original AP on XX Nov 2003. By then our extension for AP were approved on (XX-12) Nov 2003. Please note that both of us were not in USA when our extensions got approved.
I would like to know if
a) Our new AP is valid for future travel since both of us were out of USA when it was approved? More so for my wife who was out of USA whe her application was filed.
b) Have I put our 485 in jeopardy? Does this amount to intentional abandonment of our 485s? If yes, is there a remedy?
Thanks
My Response:
Dear XXXXXXXXXX:
Praise be to God, for saving your petitions! To answer your questions,
(1) Your new AP, despite being approved in your absence is certainly valid for future travel. Do not fret on this count. If at all you would have been in deep trouble was when the petitions were approved.
(2) During I-485 adjudication, this may constitute a problem. However, again don't worry, friend. They do not purposefully go after checking your arrival/departure/adjudication dates. There is a possibility for this check, but is not a certainty.
You are safe and hug each other praising God! Don't worry and be happy. Your impasse is gone!