samson_33 said:
nobigdeal,
can you please send a copy of the motion of default judgement that you filed.
I am starting to prepare for the same..
Thanks
Samson_33
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
xxxx,
Plaintiffs
V. CIVIL ACTICTION NO. CV06-XXXX
Michael Chertoff, as Secretary of the Department
of Homeland Security;
Emilio T. Gonzalez, Director of U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services;
Paul Novak, Director of Vermont Service Center,
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services;
Robert S. Muller, Director of Federal Bureau of
Investigation
Defendants
____________________________________________
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
FOR WRIT IN THE NATURE OF
MANDAMUS & DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
NOW comes the Plaintiff, XXXX, by and through Pro Se, moves the court to enter into a default judgment against the Defendants.
1. Plaintiff filed the original Complaint for Writ in the Nature of Mandamus & Declaratory Judgment in this Honorable Court on June 05, 2006. The Defendants, as well as the U.S. Attorney General and the U.S. Attorney for Eastern New York District, were properly served upon with a copy of the original complaint and the summons issued by this Honorable Court, on June 06, 2006 through certified mail pursuant to the Federal Civil Procedure. Particularly, the U.S. Attorney for Eastern New York District received the complaint and the summons on June 08, 2006. The Affidavit of Service with all the proof of deliveries was filed with the Honorable Court on July 05, 2006.
2. The summons issued by this Honorable Court clearly orders the Defendants to answer the Plaintiff’s complaint within 60 days, otherwise the default judgment against the Defendants will be ordered. The deadline for the Defendants to answer is August 07, 2006. However, 60 days has passed since the Defendants’ Counsel, U.S. Attorney, received the complaint and the summons. And the Defendants have yet to answer the Plaintiff’s Complaint.
3. The fact just clearly shows, as noted in Plaintiff’s original complaint, that the Defendants have been always ignoring any communications from the Plaintiff about his I-485 application. Even with the summons issued by this Honorable Court, the Defendants still are not willing to change their habit and chose to simply ignore the summons.
4. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully moves this Honorable Court to enter into a default judgment against the Defendants, that upon due consideration, the Court enter an order:
i. compelling Defendants to properly adjudicate Plaintiff’s application for action on an approved petition within a strict time limit;
ii. compelling Defendants to retroactively approve Plaintiff’s application to the date of August 31st, 2004, 180 days after the initial filing as required by the Congress in AC21 law.
iii. compelling Defendants to provide the Plaintiff with a Notice of Approval;
iv. awarding Plaintiff reasonable fees and cost of Court and loss of income pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act
v. granting such other relief at law and in equity as justice may require.
5. Alternatively, if this Honorable Court feels that a hearing of this matter is warranted, Plaintiff respectfully requests this Honorable Court to set this matter for trial as soon as possible. The factual records that will be uncovered in discovery will strongly support Plaintiff’s claims and prayers stated above.
Respectfully Submitted,
________________
XXXX
Date:
PRO SE