No Title
This is (almost) exactly what my employer is also telling me. He says that they are trying to decide, based on the new rule, whether or not to issue I-140 redo RFEs (as if nobody can understand the language of the new rule and how to implement it) and are waiting for a clarification from INS HQ in Washington D.C. The funny part is that INS HQ has all along (even before the new rule) maintained that in the case of a clear-cut successor-in-interest, an I-140 redo is NOT needed, but INS Vermont (ONLY) chose to tow a different line. Now, with all those I-140 redo RFEs and the new rule, it looks like they are confused again. Now it seems that their official policy is to hold processing of cases where an I-140 redo might be required. And to our "benefit", some officers seem to be stopping processing even I-485s where an I-140 (redo) has been approved....