samershahin
Registered Users (C)
info: I have emailed the US embassy in Abu Dhabi, they mentioned that i can bring official bank statement showing equivalent 19,000 USD
info: I have emailed the US embassy in Abu Dhabi, they mentioned that i can bring official bank statement showing equivalent 19,000 USD
info: I have emailed the US embassy in Abu Dhabi, they mentioned that i can bring official bank statement showing equivalent 19,000 USD
Hi Samershahin, USD19000 is for one person or family?? If we can show them official bank statement, do we still need to get sponsor letter? thank you.
Hey there!
Can someone please help me, never done anything like this before and first time looking at the I-134 Affidavit of Support
1. Does the person supporting you have to be a US citizen?
2. where do you send the forms?
thank you!![]()
Sponsor for I-864 must be US citizen or legal residentIf i want a family member (not US citizen) to be my sponsor can I fill out and send this form?
I-864, Affidavit of Support Under Section 213A of the Act
You do not to complicate it and to tire yourself mentally with Affidavit of Support.
To verify (cause you cannot send I-134 unverified) with notary public I-134 + administrative costs + to find find a good sponsor, who must be US citizen or resident who must publicly reveal his income for at least last three years and that income has to cover 125 % poverty line level for all of you + to send it to you for the interview so that it becomes part of the application- it is all too much.
All you need is a good guarantee letter from someone who is inviting you to his address and enough money as per general guidance, that would be a bank statement for the last six months
Indeed it all varies from case to case.
But in general, you could be either a good or a bad applicant: if the consul decides to ask for affidavit of support on top of other - this is usually a sing that something is wrong with your application (such as: they are suspicious the money your bank account is borrowed for the purpose of interview and so on...)
correct
sorry
there was a rule to be notarized but the rule is no longer valid