90-days stay rule in the district

[vic]

If one resides in the district for atleast 90-days before applying for N-400, but the DL may show less than 90-days before applying (since one has 60 days to transfer their DL, to another state), would the date on DL create any discrepencies when they show it as a proof of residence at the time of interview?

To clarify this a little with an example (ofcourse assuming one has already met the 4 years-9 months rule) -

One moves to another state on 1/1/05
Gets DL transferred on 2/15/05 (the state rule offers 60 days to get DL transferred)
Applies for N-400 on 4/15/05

Would this be okay as far as 90-days rule to stay in the district where you apply or based on DL, one has to wait until 5/15/05 before applying?

 

[Ocelot]

I'm not a lawyer, but... I think

vic,

To establish residency, I think you can use things like an appartment lease agreement or documents showing you opened a utilities account or established land-line phone service. Also, if you started a job in that place, a letter from your employer's HR office showing the dates and location of your employment could be used.

-Ocelot

(I'm not a lawyer)