30-day visitor visa; Why should you write to your senators? Whom-what to write?

Sify

Registered Users (C)
Why should one write to the lawmakers (senators, congressmen)? What difference would it make?

The reason is simple. Your opinion counts. A couple of years ago, greencard processing was taking forever, anywhere from 3 to 5 years. (Meanwhile would-be-immigrants would get frustrated, sometimes lose job. Besides, employers would exploit and marriage/travel/family plans would suffer etc. Basically life was a slavery then.). So, thousands of individuals like me, as well as organization like ISN (http://www.isn.org/) wrote thousands of emails and letters to senators/congressmen/IEEE/prominent individuals/Companies like INTEL & MICROSOFT as well as called local offices of lawmakers. And, as a result of such a grassroot campaign, more or less almost all the things that were being asked were made into a law passed by senate in Oct 2000. (That is the law that allows one to change job today if the adjustment of status application is still pending after 180 days, extends one\'s H1 visa for a year if one has already initiated GC process etc.) Such an actual letter is given below:

************************************************************************
Aug 27, 1999

Honorable Congressman,

I read your proposal about T-visa and I would like to comment on a related topic. I understand the purpose behind the T-visa is to increase the pool of high-tech workers.

Many of current such high-tech workers in the USA came on student visas (F and J visa) and subsequently took up jobs on H1 visa. Many of such student-turned-employees have been here for more than 6-10 years and the USA is effectively a home for them. Some of these workers have applied for their permanent residency and they are stuck in the final stage of obtaining permanent residency, called form I-485 (Adjustment of Status). For last 2 years it has been taking Immigration and Naturalization Service, INS 2 to 3 years and now it is expected to take 4-6 years unless lawmakers step in. And, that is where I am seeking your help. If the I-485s are not approved as soon as possible, the US stand to lose many of these workers as they might be forced to return to their countries defeating the very purpose of keeping their skills in the USA.

In a nutshell, this is how employment based immigration works:

Step 1: Labor Certification (This step could take 5 months to 2+ years)
Step 2: Preference Petition, I-140 (This step could take 5 months to 1+ year).
After these 2 steps one has to wait for another 1-2 years till the priority date becomes current.
Step 3: Adjustment of Status, I-485 (This step used to take 2 years to 3+ years).
Total Time: 2 ½ years to 8+ years

Before coming to Step 3,one has already spent 2-3 years. Lately INS has not been processing I-485 applications and as a result the backlog has increased quite substantially. This could be because INS has either become busy or lacks manpower and funding. So, now this step is expected to take 4-6 years in the worst case. Just imagine having to spend another 4-6 years waiting for the process, which could be done in 2-4 months! Approval of I-485 is just a formality and almost I-485s get approved.

I urge you to introduce legislation where INS is mandated to take a decision on the I-485 application within 6 months of submission. If INS fails to do so, the application should be automatically approved. Not only that if I-485 is still pending for the approval, the petitioner should be allowed to change jobs if the boss is abusive or work has not remained challenging anymore.

I hope you would find these issues important enough to add in your proposal for T-visas and get them resolved in 1999. I look forward to your reply.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

************************************************************************

My point is, IT WORKED ONCE AND IF ENOUGH OF US PROTEST; IT WOULD WORK AGAIN. After all, no terrorist is going to go back in 30 days. Similarly,
 
Why should you write?

My point is, IT WORKED ONCE AND IF ENOUGH OF US PROTEST; IT WOULD WORK AGAIN. After all, no terrorist is going to go back in 30 days. Similarly, limiting visits to just 30 days would not prevent the terrorists from committing the crimes in 30 days. Nor do the folks we call from overseas have any plan to spread terror. So, we are not asking something unreasonable.

Imagine the consequences if this regulation were to go in effect:

1. If you or anyone in your family is seriously ill and you want to call family members (parents, in-laws or siblings), they can stay at the most just ONE month. So, either one will have to quit a job, taking substantial financial hit and care for the ailing family member or send the member back to your country if you have no help here.
2. If for some reason you can not go to India and instead want to have your family members come here for a stay, they can again at the most stay just ONE month. Imagine the agony and frustration if you are stuck in the green card loop or think the parents will not live long.
3. If you are expecting a baby and want to call your parents or in-laws for help, they can not stay beyond a month. One is forced to quit the job till alternative arrangements are made and do not forget the constant stress of not having a quality care available for the newborn.

Greencard holders and many other non-immigrant visa holders of today are citizens of tomorrow and no lawmaker could afford to overlook the interests of citizens or would-be-citizens. Individually, one might not have nay clout; but when hundreds of thousands of flood, the INS and lawmakers with a reasonable request; they WILL LISTEN AND ACT ON THIS.
 
Why should you write?

So, guys and girls; please do the following:

(A) Contact INS at:

http://www.ins.usdoj.gov/graphics/e...rpSysID=2&StartURL=/graphics/feedback.htm

INS Docket Number: 2176-01
Title of the Notice/Regulation: Admission period for B nonimmigrant aliens, 02-08297

(B) Write letters (and, if possible pl. call the local offices of your lawmakers) to:

(1) Your senator (http://www.senate.gov/contacting/index_by_state.cfm) and
(2) Congressman (http://www.house.gov/writerep/).
(3) SUBCOMMITTEE ON IMMIGRATION can be reached at
http://judiciary.senate.gov/subcommittees/immigration.cfm.
(4) White House E-Mail Addresses
President George W. Bush: president@whitehouse.gov
Vice President Richard Cheney: vice.president@whitehouse.gov

(C) Petition Online:

http://www.petitiononline.com/INS/petition.html

A Sample letter is given below:

************************************************************************
Honorable Senator/Congressman/President:

I would like to comment on the proposed INS regulation where INS is proposing to restrict tourists and business travelers to 30-day visits, down from the current six months.

I totally disagree with this proposed regulation. I understand INS\' need to monitor and have greater control over visa holders\' activities. However, no terrorist is going to go back in 30 days. Similarly, limiting visits to just 30 days would not prevent the terrorists from committing the crimes in 30 days.

Instead it is going to punish millions of innocent, law-abiding, tourists to find a potential suspect. It is tantamount to proposing a reduction in the number of cars/drivers to lower road accidents. That is not the right approach. According to the year 2000 census, there are about 31 million foreign-born people in the United States. That means that approximately one out of every ten people in the U.S. is an immigrant. And, they have parents and siblings overseas. This proposed regulation would make it difficult for overseas relatives to come and see their beloved family members. This regulation flies in the face of family values that the US stands for.
 
Besides, it is going to hurt, trade and tourism. As per Dept of Commerce, in 2000 alone, 51 millions visitors came to the USA. They spent a whopping $102.7 billion - of which $82 billion was while in the US and $20.7 on US airlines while making the trip. Just when the economy is picking up, this proposal has potential to afflict significant damage to the nascent recovery and future economic growth.

I believe, instead INS should improve their computer system and cross check any visitor with the FBI database. A deeper CIA background check could also be done. INS must abandon this proposed regulation altogether.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

************************************************************************
 
Oppose 30-day proposal: http://www.petitiononline.com/INS/petition.html

under the new visistor rule family members can stay in USA only for 30 days. We have only 400 signatures to express our support for NOT implementing the new INS rule to restrict visitor visa to 30 days. Please click and sign here and pass this message to others.

Please go online and sign the petition
http://www.petitiononline.com/INS/petition.html

For those who are not familiar with the proposed new INS rule, you can
find
>that on the following link:
>
>http://www.ins.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/newsrels/visa.htm

========================================
Also see http://www.immihelp.com/visas/visitor/letters.html
for sample letters
 
Top