I was wondering about this based on sbctsublc reports.
many of the approved cases show the previous status as "resumed and some date in 2002" which obviously is the date for 1st FP.
some show "resumed and some date in late 2003 or 2004" which is the date for 2nd FP.
In the first case, these people got approved without 2nd FP even though the 1st one has definitely expired. On this forum the 2nd FP that we see are only a small portion of all the cases that are in file at vsc.
therefore, I think that 2nd FP notices are issued for a small no of cases (maybe randomly) but are not always required.
Is that true ?
many of the approved cases show the previous status as "resumed and some date in 2002" which obviously is the date for 1st FP.
some show "resumed and some date in late 2003 or 2004" which is the date for 2nd FP.
In the first case, these people got approved without 2nd FP even though the 1st one has definitely expired. On this forum the 2nd FP that we see are only a small portion of all the cases that are in file at vsc.
therefore, I think that 2nd FP notices are issued for a small no of cases (maybe randomly) but are not always required.
Is that true ?