It\'s not that clear cut Canadian
CSC apparently thinks there is a requirement to work for the sponsoring employer for 180 days after filing the I-485 and they are denying I-485\'s when this cannot be shown according to Sheela Murthy. Other service centers appear to be taking a less restrictive view but until there are implementing regulations, there\'s no definitive answer on this. I realize that the language of AC21 does not impose this requirement but that does not mean that the implementing regulations will not. There\'s also the obvious question of intent and immigration fraud if a person files an I-485 (thereby saying that they intend to remain employed with the sponsoring company "permanently" and then leaving the next day. The shorter the period is the more questionable the intent becomes.
Jim
CSC apparently thinks there is a requirement to work for the sponsoring employer for 180 days after filing the I-485 and they are denying I-485\'s when this cannot be shown according to Sheela Murthy. Other service centers appear to be taking a less restrictive view but until there are implementing regulations, there\'s no definitive answer on this. I realize that the language of AC21 does not impose this requirement but that does not mean that the implementing regulations will not. There\'s also the obvious question of intent and immigration fraud if a person files an I-485 (thereby saying that they intend to remain employed with the sponsoring company "permanently" and then leaving the next day. The shorter the period is the more questionable the intent becomes.
Jim