You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
140 approved, EB3, ND 3/22/2003
- Thread starter luckymindy
- Start date
Re: vijrek...
Raju ,
Usually harrisburg SESA wont send any kind of receipts, When I applied, harrisburg SESA was current, Though they sent my case to philly DOL, in few days, My case was not updated in voicemail system untill december, I was little curious about the status, when I calledup SESA, I came to know, about details, I mean PD & the date they sent my case to DOL.
Most of the SESA will inform to attorneys when the case move to DOL, harrisburg wont do that.
Thanks
Raju ,
Usually harrisburg SESA wont send any kind of receipts, When I applied, harrisburg SESA was current, Though they sent my case to philly DOL, in few days, My case was not updated in voicemail system untill december, I was little curious about the status, when I calledup SESA, I came to know, about details, I mean PD & the date they sent my case to DOL.
Most of the SESA will inform to attorneys when the case move to DOL, harrisburg wont do that.
Thanks
gc_majburi
Registered Users (C)
Re: usnycus...thanks
My PD from Philly DOL is Aug 2002. my I140 RD is 28-Apr-2003. I do not think PD makes any difference. It is just the RD of I140 which makes the difference for I140 approval.
My understanding is that PD is only useful when the processing is not current. Since all employment based categories became current more than a year ago, I feel PD is inconsequential ?
Originally posted by rajudm
In that case does this priority date mean anything for I140 processing? As you mentioned that August PD have got approved. May be by Feb/March I should see something.
My PD from Philly DOL is Aug 2002. my I140 RD is 28-Apr-2003. I do not think PD makes any difference. It is just the RD of I140 which makes the difference for I140 approval.
My understanding is that PD is only useful when the processing is not current. Since all employment based categories became current more than a year ago, I feel PD is inconsequential ?
worldcitizen
Registered Users (C)
PD current
Is it possible that PD can not become current like in 2000? In that case, have people who applied 140/485 be affected?
Is it possible that PD can not become current like in 2000? In that case, have people who applied 140/485 be affected?
gc_majburi
Registered Users (C)
Re: PD current
If such a situation arises, then people who have already applied will not affected. People trying to apply after the declaration that applications will be accepted based on PD will be affected.
Existing filers should not be affected.
Originally posted by worldcitizen
Is it possible that PD can not become current like in 2000? In that case, have people who applied 140/485 be affected?
If such a situation arises, then people who have already applied will not affected. People trying to apply after the declaration that applications will be accepted based on PD will be affected.
Existing filers should not be affected.
worldcitizen
Registered Users (C)
Re: Re: PD current
Any reason why PD wasnt current back in the 90s and early 2000? why did it suddenly become current now
Originally posted by gc_majburi
If such a situation arises, then people who have already applied will not affected. People trying to apply after the declaration that applications will be accepted based on PD will be affected.
Existing filers should not be affected.
Any reason why PD wasnt current back in the 90s and early 2000? why did it suddenly become current now