My company (chemical) just finished a 3-month recruitment (in MA). The attorney wrote a 3 page result report with a few sentences for each of the 9 applicants and a summary of the ads. I wonder whether that's sufficient.
I read from some webpages that the report should include things like ...
This must happen often: after the recruitment ad, many H-1 and F-1 holders send in resume. My question is: Can these resumes be disregarded because they are from non-US workers (without mentioning them in the recruitment report)?
In other words, can the company only consider GC holders and...
Thanks to every one who provided useful information or well-intended comments (no matter positive or negative). It was a nice experience exchanging information with you people. It is much easier to communicate with people like this: willing to help, not eager to do unnecessary and baseless...
I don't understand how this got so complicated. But if this has to go on... Ok
First of all, I posted a clear question: Is it appropriate to put in a paragraph in the petition. If you know the answer and are willing to help, please say it and brief explain your reason. Otherwise, please...
Thanks to all for the information.
I think I made my question clear, and I didn't force any one who does not want to help to do anything.
As I said before, I just wanted to give the forum a try, see if I can get some useful information. I think I'll stop here.
I would love to hire one if he/she can go over my case seriously.
I did get into contact with several. But my feeling is:
They first simply look at the numbers -- papers + citations + patents... then see if they can fit your case into one of their templates. If your case isn't that...
Thanks to all for the information.
My background: PhD, material science, 2 years' exp. 1 patent, 3 papers, ~ 5 citations. All in the same general field, but not closely related to our product. I think my strongest point should be my contribution to my company based on the product. It¡¯s one...
Thanks for the information. The problem is:
Our company developed a 'revolutionary' product, and I developed processes to reduce the cost significantly. This is the first product in the field, and there¡¯re just not many people who know enough about the product, let alone independent...
Thank you both for the information. For my case, there¡¯s no problem proving the national interests aspects. The major problem is independent recommendation, and the reason is explained above. I don¡¯t know what to say ¨C It seems the only chance would be to ask someone who doesn¡¯t know my...
For NIW case, it is difficult for me to obtain independent references due to my work. I wonder whether the following explanation is acceptable by BCIS. Experts please help. Thanks!
"Dr. Nist's (myself) innovation is highly product-oriented and is proprietary to E company. As the industry...
Are there any regulations then? Does the wording of the field have to match the 'non technical job description' in form I-140, or is if flexible? When you change job, will the 'title' in 140 determine your field, or will the 'non technical job description' do? Thanks.
I have a technical question regarding NIW:
Are there any regulations on how to define your FIELD? For example, if you are a biologist working on mosquito control, how should you state what your field is? Biology, or mosquito control? The choice would make a huge difference when you argue...
Thanks Jim. I wonder what the format of such a statement should be. Should my CEO write something, then ask a government official to cut and paste it into a letter and sign it, as if it were written totally by the official? Or should the official point out that he learned about these facts...
Thanks Brian.
The difficult thing is: I can not get very specific governent recommendations. All they can say is : 1) These projects are based on X company's product, which is very important; 2) According to the CEO of X comany, Mr. ABC will plays an important role in developing the...
One comment on the NYSDOT:
It never explicitly address the question of time difference between LC and NIW process, which is often significant.
Suppose in the NYSDOT case, the petitioner argued that: 1) The NYSDOT needs the beneficiary's skill as soon as possible; 2) He can only start to...
Thanks for your message. Here again comes the point:
These projects need me as soon as possible. And my background is unique, although not enough for "extraordinaly ability". If I go through the LC process, I can not work on these projects. So the logic goes like this:
1. My back ground is...
Thanks for the message. I was aware of the points that you mentioned. But the thing is:
It's the NASA and Air Force projects that will suffer, although my company would also suffer.
Besides, consider this situation: Suppose I'm developing a material for my company that's very useful...
I wonder whether the following arguments alone would work for the third criterion of NIW:
My company needs my unique background for important government projects (NASA, Air Force) that require US GC or citizenship. If I go through LC process, it¡¯ll take much longer time before I can work on...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.