Search results

  1. A

    DV-2015 winners from Asia with CN 10,000+

    It's unfair. 7% of world visa quota for each country is still a too large share. 5% or even 4% is a more moderate limit to achieve the diversity.
  2. A

    DV-2015 winners from Asia with CN 10,000+

    ROA with 60% of Asia quota is a more suitable way to meet the true meaning of diversity. With Nepal and Iran taking 70~80% of Asia quota, duopoly visa is a better name to replace diversity visa in Asia.
  3. A

    DV-2015 winners from Asia with CN 10,000+

    In light of your logic, so you think the 7% limit of world visa for each country is unfair?
  4. A

    DV-2015 winners from Asia with CN 10,000+

    Truely, the wrong countries (ROA) you called are mainly caused by the DV progress.
  5. A

    DV-2015 winners from Asia with CN 10,000+

    In your extreme case, if the rate of being selected is 1%, then 50 for ROA, 3,500 for Nepal and Iran, respectively. Are 7,050 visa under quota? I don't know. In Statistics, we call these extreme cases "outliers", and they will not be taken into consideration. In reality, your extreme case will...
  6. A

    DV-2015 winners from Asia with CN 10,000+

    Since the "diversity" is based on the region(AF, EU, AS,.....), then the visa quota for each country should also be based on its according region quota rather than 7% of the world. In Accounting, 20% of shares means a significant effect. Therefore, I would limit visa quota of each country to...
  7. A

    September VB - DV14 Last Chapter

    According to CEAC 7-2-2014 for AS provided by Rafibo, it seems that the density of ROA is decreasing after 10k. 1000 249 2000 267 3000 293 4000 274 5000 308 6000 253 7000 348 8000 275 9000 242 10000 265 11000 221 12000 216 12700 129 3440 1~12700 10001~12700 263 210 Average
  8. A

    Asia DV14 Progress from Jun to Sept

    Kayend. Have all embassies and consulates updated the CN from 8900 to 12700 for AS in the CEAC? Could you please update the data in the cvs format(upload the file)? Thanks.
Top