I do not want to reply but --
It is not my membership issue at all and any connection with AARP or any any thing --and it also not any one's membership concern, but just using that word may be felt as inappropriate for some group.I do not want to elaborate...
Hello 'BadKarma',How is it it-- in a GOOD taste really?(Using the word 'Ret..')
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: I am not a lawyer and I am just a lay man without any legal knowledge. !
Read the above STRICTLY at your own risk.
As per section Section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act:
'The term "national of the United States" means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States'.
Hence these...
QUOTE=chicago75;2087440]r u kidding me !!!!!
Just I wish to state again, I am not a lawyer or competent to infer, apply, conclude or advise on law or legal matters and I am like one of the forum members. So every one can infer themselves with their search for their own or contact a lawyer .:)...
True, but how to elicit what CBP stand is, unless they verbally tell the person
they have not 'detained' him?
Does CBP field manual chapter 12 to 44 may not be clear on this too,I guess
Otherwise the issue still --stands 'status quo'.
That is the problem with routine secondary inspections...
In some of the states,deceptively using the service(like cable service,or kinda other utility) and not paying when billed,may be construed or charged under 'theft of service'(Criminal charge) and you know what is that under moral character for N400:)...
Agreed --but again I state that the above matter is related to a certificate obtained illegally or by Fraud and notice is to be served with allegations and all that. AAO decision mentions that.
But in OPs case as posted , is not that issue and cancelling arbitrarily at visit still doesn't meet...
This is where it is not as per the law .Can you please guide me a section of law under INA or CFR or admistrative guidelines or BIA or AAO or any case law decisions ,Executive orders or reported in any forum,where it this kind ,under an umbrella,permitted.
So far what I could see cancellation...
No revocation just by CIS and it can NOT be independent operation.
Once oath taken,the person was already naturalized.
If CIS wants to revoke, first the proceedings shall be in the court for revocation of NATZ ,if found,then order to be passed by court by decree for revocation of...
This part is impossible.see the section further ,quoted by me,for under
'proof of service part' for the notice.
I guess,CIS will be in great problem if they resort to this confiscating under claim of any type of 'revocation'...
Just wanted to bring out the following, since some serious words are tossed here like 'revoking' a naturalization certificate.(especailly when it was not obtained by --fraudulently,with material concealment and so on,as the OP seems to have none of these..as per OP postings so far there are...
Perfectly right!Not only 'heavy burden' of proof but seems total burden of proof.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: I am not a lawyer and I am just a lay man without any legal knowledge.!
Read the above STRICTLY at your own risk.
I am not concluding any thing but LPR seems- faces the similar(but may be little lesser) situations to that a non-immigrant at POE or border crossing!.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: I am not a lawyer and I am just a lay man without any legal...
I think naturalized citizens file will have this overhang by A# till the ....
The A will be be the extra tag for NATZ. than others and once A# is there they can access all the details.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: I am not a lawyer and I...
Congratulations and time to go party!
But you are not American indian(native?)but guess you are from Asian- Indian
and now you became American--Asian Indian ;)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: I am not a lawyer and I am just a lay man without...
If some one is held back from the normal flow and was allowed to move only after relatively considerable time and questioning ,I guess it to be construed as 'detention'.
Also,one in 'detention',not in free normal movement along with others,is forced to some restriction .
Does these...
Seems the OP was questioned by an border agent.
Please go to usborderpatrol.com and go under 'being detained',part3.(Not sure whether it is an official site or unofficial site but gives some idea.
But official site for CBP seems cbp.gov and not this and also not able to find about the...
example -who moved to new service area after applying
Just for information on the topic related.(it was from 2005 postings).This is the first one I found in this forum upon searching and this may be useful who are in....
The guy had moved to a different service area (in the same state)...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.