Search results

If that is the case, then there is not much she should worry. The CBP officer may have put some notes there, but that alone should not cause an issue. One scenario is that if his father's asylum claim mentions about him being also persecuted there is a little chance that his trip could...

Good catch.:D:D:D: It is not "principle"; it is "principal", though.;);););) :D:D:D:

Hmm...... Are you derivative or principal?

How about the revival of 4-year waiting for LPRs? Then all my siblings will be able to file this year, and hopefully, all should be USC by year-end. At that time, I would kiss them and say good-bye.:D:D:D:D

For the selfish reason to all immigrants still waiting in the pipeline, this is not a great idea. Recent improvement in the immigration process coincides with downturn economy, increased government spending (government jobs), raised fees and no extra burden for USCIS. I have no doubt if this...

The DNA test was a direct result of the fraud analysis conducted by USCIS some years ago. The analysis revealed that a high percentage (I forgot how high) of alleged derivative asylees ("wives" or "children") had no blood relationship with the principal. Yes, he/she can withdraw the visa...

Every country is a bit different. I once traveled to those countries that people just don't care. If you present them the passport issued by "United States of Mars", you will get stamped and let in.:D:D:D:D:D:D There are also those countries in western Africa that you must renew your NP...

Dude, Do not want to be rude (indeed), but why don't you just read the instruction one more time? No one here can overwrite what is listed there.:cool: For your last question, apparently you are NOT PR yet, so you have to select that you are asylee.

Dude, No one would know the answer unless you put up your asylum application. Just do what Thankful said, find a good attorney and ask for your situation. I donot think your medical problem is an issue, though.

I don't think you will have any problem. I thought Uzbekistan was not under dictatorship anymore. I could be wrong.

I must agree. Although I incline to think that having been waiting for so long really is a pain, I would say it is futile to file WOM as USCIS can claim that it is statutorily barred from adjudicating your case (therefore you fail to state a claim). The only alternative I can think of is to...

Maybe it is different now, but when I did it the complete results was not available until several days later, as there was some lab / blood testing needed to be done. I visited the doctor after a week to pick up the sealed envelop. I also verbally confirmed with him that everything was ok.

Thankful, I am not trying to scare him. But if the waiver of inadmissibility is not granted at the time of adjustment of status, isn't that leading to deportation (INA Section 237)?

Dude, I am sorry that you are in this situation. Someone has sued trying to strike down this. At the end of 2007, 9th Circuit affirmed the ruling of a California district judge, that this provision was vague and improperly sweeping. Bush administration (I was not surprised at all)...

Thankful, Rea this case filed last year. a previous asylee from Iraq, currently fighting for us, had been waiting for 1.5 years. This is not acceptable.

If I have to grade their performance, it will be A minus or B plus. They did clear up a lot of backlogs, and the waiting period is noticeably shorter. I will say within this year you will be adjudicated.

If they deny him, he has two levels up (immigration court and bia) to go. In that sense refugee is actually much better: after one year either you get out or adjusted.:D:D:D:D:D

You are right on this. This is a really close call. Most of asylees receive waiver for whatever they did before the asylum grant, not after. Hopefully, they realize that he did not do this for money, and he had bona fide marriage, and his now-wife has credible fear of persecution. Dude...

You are right..... Isn't that waiver granted routinely, though? especially both of them now are asylees. I still hope he was charged something else: this type of waiver is completely discretionary and no court can even review, the highest he can go is BIA.

But it looks to me that the authorized waiver only applies to LPR assisting the person who is, at the time of the action, their spouse, parent, son or daughter (and no other individual) to enter the United States. If inadmissibility can not be waived, he will be asylee forever? Man, I really...