Search results

They have received my RFE on 01/13/05 and approved it just today (03/10/05). So it takes more time for them than just 1 or 2 weeks sometime...

curryus, You can call them, 60 days passed I think

Mine one is even older. After 60 days we have got the possibility to ask them.

That fact that you still has not received back anything from them does not necessarily mean that you will got a new RFE from them. You have to wait 60 days, and after that you may ask them what in the hell they are doing again...

This is not as bad as it looks like for the first time. As far as I know though the old employer formally can revoke the I-140 but that does not really matter because according to the AC21 law more than 180 day passsed and your friend changed employer just after that. So I140 will remain valid...

It seems to be too early. I have got the same case and it is 3 weeks older. But you might mention it in some form, so later -if you really need help - you can turn to her in this regard.

Well, they site says: "It is taking between 570 and 600 days for us to process this kind of case. However because preliminary processing was complete, the remaining processing time will be less than the maximum stated in this message." So, if they will process it within 569 days, that is...

Definitely ! It would be much faster if this whole stamping bussiness monopolium would be outsourced to Bangalore and other intelligent places e.g. so we could get the approvals from there directly. The present plain state's farmer solution is very frustrating, they do not have any...

As for the wording: it is pretty much the standard. Shrikanth

Sorry guys, I am not experienced in this but this case does not seem to be complicated to me. Why just not to send and EVL letter and some paychecks in as ginnu suggested ? Is there any special difficulty here ?

I think this is the article that tanjar is talking about: 2/18/2004: I-140 Petition, "Ability to Pay" Requirement, and USCIS Plan * Lately, a host of I-140 immigrant petitions have been denied on the issue of petitioning employer's financial ability to pay the proffered wage. The...

I gave got very limited expertise on this area so I might miss important steps, but I would make sure that : 1. I140 has already been approved. 2. The new employer is willing to give you EVL letter 3. The new employer is willing to give financial info if it will be needed an they are in a...

So what is your experience: are they satisified with an EVL letter and some paychecks in the everyday practice or there is a need to play the new company's ability to pay circus too in each and every case ?

Thanks for the clarification. It would more rational if the ability to pay game would be played just when they are in a position to make a decision instead of requiring it continuosly for years (e.g. last month if Peoplesoft supported a guy he was a good guy. This week some of those might not...

As far as know, the law does not require the ability to pay criteria from the new employer. So in this sense there is no need to repeat things. However, as we can see from the aravind741's RFE, the new employer also has to prove the ability to pay and provide the same documents that the first...

These TWO seems to be the same thing...,sorry

It looks like that the I-140 needs to be repeated for the new employer. Is this a new practice or always used to be the case for AC21s? Then I do not understand what is I140 or AC21 for if it needs to be repeated anyway :) . These too seems to be the same thing...

Thanks. Is this the default ? Any other experience ?

So they always ask both EVL, paystubs AND company's financials ? Thanks, Shrikanth

Does anybody have an information about if one changes an employer based on AC21, a financial statement from the new employer is always required or EVL used to be enough ? Thanks in advance, Shrikanth