They screwed up the forms. The question is have you ever been cited. The "exception" is if it's under $500 then you don't have to provide documentation. The result is that 1) it appears you should list ALL citations/tickets but 2) you don't have to provide documentation that you paid them...
The 72 hours is an estimate if there is no hit. But you never know - at GC stage (after they expanded the name check) some people waited a month and then at natz they waited 6 months or a year - go figure.
and yet, there are users on this board who filed in '05 and who haven't heard anything. Someone is not telling the truth. Actually, probably the NC cleared but they hadn't notified CIS or they did and the results are languishing at CIS. One thing that they said they are doing is sending more...
mka: how did you get to the interview point so quickly (last message you left I think you were proposing a lawsuit - I could have misread)? when did you get your IL?
what he means is that you can sue them after 120 days of the interview as per 1447(b). If you get an oath notice before that time, then obviously there would be no reason to sue.
On the other hand, a few years ago some folks up in Seattle got denied b/c they fished without a permit or some such other thing and that got reversed. It's all facts dependent. Absent gross misconduct you cannot sue the individual, you have to sue the agency.
It's not FBI's fault that CIS asked them to do name checks with reference files and resent them 4m old name checks to redo. This despite the fact that there is nothing in the law that requires them to do tha kind of check. I am not even sure if they do that level of a check when you apply for...
Even if this is true, was there something on the letter to indicate that? If not, it would be a bit of a coincidence for someone from MD just to happen to ask this question (in which case you wouldn't answer the first question I asked probably).
are you joking? who cares if it's torn up - they have you in their system for an interview on date x. I bet you even if you had lost it, they would see you. I agree it's better not torn than torn but if you are really that bothered get an infopass - though at the infopass they might just look...
that's because you're only part customer. you're also part-suspect. the other piece of this is that Congress since 1990 at least won't deign to fund CIS as they do with almost every other bureaucracy which of course, limits what can be done. finally, it's a bureaucracy... add to that that it...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.