Recent content by wurzbach

simple answer is: he is deportable if USCIS get eyes on him. The 5-year Statute of Limitations(SOL) does not work on this situation because USCIS has no notice that he has run afoul with the law and the person cannot take advantage of POE officer's mistake (actually, USCIS can kick away the...

This is a bona fide MISLEADING! It does not deserve my time to rebut. According to JoeF, reentry permit should not exist at all. What a rediculous! Any PR has the advantage to work up to two years FOR GOOD outside and will meet no trouble to enter US by holding a valid reentry permit!

seems that our biggest authority here, JoeF, also did not read the case. not surprise that what he can do is only to exaggerate some lawyers' speculation. Thank you, I am so honored! :cool:

Do not try to scare people here just after reading an article, please......things are not so bad as you think......if you have applied the reentry permit in good faith and you have some ties with US during your less than 2 years of departure, you are safe to enter US with the valid permit...

you think I did not notice the error? It is a error from Lexis and I do not want to correct it.......

From court opinion, it seems that he only applied reentry permits twice (each for two years); he did not show reentry permit for his last entry after spending one year outside. same thing happened to the poor lady in the first case, she used reentry permit for the first time; after that she...

case law, reentry permit and ties with US Provide two cases involving reentry permits and the ties with US. my understanding with reentry permit is: 1) reentry permit is a prima facia proof that your departure is in temporary nature, showing a valid reentry permit at POE ensures that...

Several points deserve readers' attention in reading Matter of Marcoux (decided in August 1968) and YUI SING TSE (1979). 1). Around 1970's, there were two lines of cases about employee's intent. Cases in line with Marcoux found that the employees had the intention to work for the employers at...

you should be very cautious and consult a competent lawyer immediately to fix the hole. 1) when you lose your job before receiving the approval of your I-140, you lose the basis for your immigration petition. That means INS issued the I-140 approval by a mistake and the approved I-140 is not...

Poor pralay, you are not disagreeing with me; YOU ARE DISGREEING WITH THE LAW and insisting on using your great imaginary to fabricate "theories" to poison others.

Petitioner claimed a sixth preference visa was immediately available to him under section 203(a)(6). The Board held that because petitioner intended to change his occupation from Chinese specialty cook if and when he completed dental school, his petition for a sixth preference visa was no longer...

Read the first case in my Final Answers and clean up your mind now. 1) INS did not make any problems with any GC holders' intent in light of changing job right away after they get the GCs since 1968. 2)The applicants can rightly preserve their private intent to change their job in the...

no one denis that departure should be in temporary nature; but if going one step further, is not the requirement from the law.

To Robwoj, Hadron and all other people except the JoeF and Pralay: Nothing in the law said that "going abroad for good" is a bad faith and will subject you to give up GC. read the following law review by the most authoritive experts of US and you can see that the two idiots have...

for your question, you should ask JoeF and Pralay, not me. And you seem fogetting what we were talking about. pralay and JoeF claimed again and again that "you should not show any suspecion to INS" that you do not intend to work for the GC sponsor permanently at the time of filing...