A woman without I-131 has been admitted for reentry by the CBP. Her GC will be revoked when she applies for her citizenship just because of no I-131 filed before. Is that what you try to say? Why can’t you post it again so people can know you very well?
Both above are correct. That's why some Chinese LPR hesitate to apply for the citizenship but keep their LPR, especially those who need convenience to visit China. Are they smart? May be.
What do you mean by “If USCIS determines at a later date that the woman met the test for abandonment of permanent residency as mentioned in the INA?”
Only no I-131 filed does not violate the immigration law. If you are talking about the other facts, that will be the different thing. Filing...
That’s interesting. You need a visa because you are a Canadian citizen but rather a US LPR. You may have had got your Canadian citizen before you got your US LPR, right?
Do not try to find it. Actually, you can't. The 8 CFR... Section 211.3 tells you the reentry permit is a valid travel document. It has nothing to do with the subject. There is no such law that one must file I-131. It is just your invention if you think so. Filing I-131 is just to show one’s...
What terms are violated? You have been asked several times to show the law and regulations that without filing I-131 is a violation of the immigration law. Why can’t you specify it? What presumption can be dug up if one has already been allowed reentry and lived in USA, no I-131 ever filed or...
Do you mean ever left the country for more than one year without I-131 filed has violated the immigration law and if this violation is dug out, the GC will be revoked?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.