Multiple 485s: Marriage Based 485 application while Employement Based 485 is Pending

TKD,

website looks legitimate. Looks like, it's still a pilot program, but it doesn't hurt to try, I guess.

Good luck everybody!
 
Hello everyone!

Currently, I am working with my H1B (9th year) and I plan on renewing it if needed but here is the big question, if I don't want to renew my H1B -

Which EAD to use? (I have Employment based EAD and Family based EAD) -

If I use employment based EAD, then the family based GC process shuts down?
If I use family based EAD, then the employment based GC process shuts down?

What about renewals? Do I have to renew both of the EADs?

Because of this confusion, I am still on my H1b - keeping both the AOS alive.

What about you guys - which EAD are you using?
 
Hello everyone!

Currently, I am working with my H1B (9th year) and I plan on renewing it if needed but here is the big question, if I don't want to renew my H1B -

Which EAD to use? (I have Employment based EAD and Family based EAD) -

If I use employment based EAD, then the family based GC process shuts down?
If I use family based EAD, then the employment based GC process shuts down?

What about renewals? Do I have to renew both of the EADs?

Because of this confusion, I am still on my H1b - keeping both the AOS alive.

What about you guys - which EAD are you using?

I don't think it matters which EAD you apply for. It should not affect your other GC application. EAD for post-2007 485 applications is free. So, it makes sense to apply for FB EAD.
 
I don't think it matters which EAD you apply for. It should not affect your other GC application. EAD for post-2007 485 applications is free. So, it makes sense to apply for FB EAD.

GRG2005 is right, the EAD does not affect your applications, and since you paid the new fee for the FB 485, the EAD comes free as part of that deal.



Still on the issue of file transfer, I saw the following article, which includes email addresses to use for contacting the service centers (30 days after placing a service request):

http://immigrationroad.com/green-card/contact-uscis-fbi.php
 
I don't think it matters which EAD you apply for. It should not affect your other GC application. EAD for post-2007 485 applications is free. So, it makes sense to apply for FB EAD.

The reason I asked is because the employment based EAD has the receipt # of Employment based I485 and Family based EAD has the receipt # of Family based I485. I remember asking this question to the IO and he told if I use the EAD (FB based) then the employment based GC is closed and possibility vice-versa

EAD is issued for a pending I485. Applying is free but renewing is not free - costs around $300 or so

Confused.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The reason I asked is because the employment based EAD has the receipt # of Employment based I485 and Family based EAD has the receipt # of Family based I485. I remember asking this question to the IO and he told if I use the EAD (FB based) then the employment based GC is closed and possibility vice-versa

EAD is issued for a pending I485. Applying is free but renewing is not free - costs around $300 or so

Confused.

That is pretty crazy (and scary) statement by IO. I am having hard time beleiving it. If this is true then why is multiple 485 allowed in the first place. The way I am looking at it, if you have a pending 485 then you have a right to apply for EAD against it.
My case is similar. I have applied for a EAD alongwith the FB 485. If they approve new EAD, then as per your IO statement, they would be closing our old EB 485. Let us see if that happens. I will keep you guys posted.
 
The reason I asked is because the employment based EAD has the receipt # of Employment based I485 and Family based EAD has the receipt # of Family based I485. I remember asking this question to the IO and he told if I use the EAD (FB based) then the employment based GC is closed and possibility vice-versa

EAD is issued for a pending I485. Applying is free but renewing is not free - costs around $300 or so

Confused.

Where did you read renewing is not free?
 
During my wife FB interview at Santa Ana, CA, the immigration officer pointed out that my wife last H1B (expired in Jan 2008) was not renewed and thus my wife has been out of status since (from Jan 2008 to Feb 2010). My wife’s employer applied for EB I-485 in July 2007, and she has 3 EAD from that sponsorship. I sponsored her with my US citizenship in Feb 2010, and she has 1 current valid EAD from that as well. I am not 100% sure if the out of status statement is accurate. But, the fact that the officer pointed that out make my wife do not want to travel outside US with her advance parole (she got it through my sponsorship). I asked the IO - what if the travel is emergency (i.e.: my wife grandparents is sick). He said, there is a probability of yes and no entry. I am sharing this as point to consider if you are deciding to renew or not renew your H-1.
 
During my wife FB interview at Santa Ana, CA, the immigration officer pointed out that my wife last H1B (expired in Jan 2008) was not renewed and thus my wife has been out of status since (from Jan 2008 to Feb 2010). My wife’s employer applied for EB I-485 in July 2007, and she has 3 EAD from that sponsorship. I sponsored her with my US citizenship in Feb 2010, and she has 1 current valid EAD from that as well. I am not 100% sure if the out of status statement is accurate. But, the fact that the officer pointed that out make my wife do not want to travel outside US with her advance parole (she got it through my sponsorship). I asked the IO - what if the travel is emergency (i.e.: my wife grandparents is sick). He said, there is a probability of yes and no entry. I am sharing this as point to consider if you are deciding to renew or not renew your H-1.

Another statement by IO that makes no sense. If your wife had a pending I-485 with a valid EAD, then how could she be out of status.
But I agree with your point about not traveling on AP. You should take this risk only if it is absolutely neccessary. Last time my wife traveled on AP, we had to tolerate some ridiculous comments from immigration office at the port of entry. It was not a pleasant experience even though we had a very straight forward case at the time.
 
During my wife FB interview at Santa Ana, CA, the immigration officer pointed out that my wife last H1B (expired in Jan 2008) was not renewed and thus my wife has been out of status since (from Jan 2008 to Feb 2010). My wife’s employer applied for EB I-485 in July 2007, and she has 3 EAD from that sponsorship. I sponsored her with my US citizenship in Feb 2010, and she has 1 current valid EAD from that as well. I am not 100% sure if the out of status statement is accurate. But, the fact that the officer pointed that out make my wife do not want to travel outside US with her advance parole (she got it through my sponsorship). I asked the IO - what if the travel is emergency (i.e.: my wife grandparents is sick). He said, there is a probability of yes and no entry. I am sharing this as point to consider if you are deciding to renew or not renew your H-1.

The IO is very very wrong, I have traveled on my AP twice since my H-1b expired in 2009 and I had valid EAD too. If you don't need to travel, you should not. However that statement about tour wife being out of status when she had a pending 485 is wring, unless there is something else I am missing about her case.
 
Approval of EAD does not close the pending I485 but "USING" it may have different meaning altogether. I desperately want to use my EAD but am confused because both my EAD are approved but I haven't used them yet...still working on my H1B.

If I use my employment based EAD for a new job then I will have to notify USCIS/file AC21 but if I use FB based EAD then I don't....there is surely difference. Are there any repercussions?
 
If I use my employment based EAD for a new job then I will have to notify USCIS/file AC21 but if I use FB based EAD then I don't....there is surely difference. Are there any repercussions?

Even if you use the FB EAD, you still have to file AC21 if you want to keep the EB I-485 alive if the employer asks USCIS to revoke the I-140.
 
During my wife FB interview at Santa Ana, CA, the immigration officer pointed out that my wife last H1B (expired in Jan 2008) was not renewed and thus my wife has been out of status since (from Jan 2008 to Feb 2010). My wife’s employer applied for EB I-485 in July 2007, and she has 3 EAD from that sponsorship.

Did you counteract the IO's statement by pointing out that the EB I-485 was filed before her H1B expiration, and that she has had valid EADs ever since? Perhaps the IO was not aware of those facts.
 
Thanks Jack - So if I don't file AC21, then my EBI485 file is closed. Correct?
Only if the employer gets USCIS to revoke the I-140, and you don't have AC21 to counteract the revocation.

Any impact on the FBI485?
No, your employer halting your EB case won't affect your FB case, provided that you have EAD/AP for the Family based so your employment and travel doesn't get messed up by the employment-based case dying.
 
Did you counteract the IO's statement by pointing out that the EB I-485 was filed before her H1B expiration, and that she has had valid EADs ever since? Perhaps the IO was not aware of those facts.

Yes, I showed him all original EADs (he took one expired one), and I showed him all H1 approvals, and the EB 485 receipt. I told him that EB 485 is submitted on July 2007 - 6 months prior H1 expiration on Jan 2008. And, the EB 485 was always pending until I withdrew in May 2010. And, Feb 2010 is when I sponsored FB 485. So, it has been a continued process. He countered that EB 485 is not technically a visa. I told him that I disagree with him, but I choose not argue further since there is no point anymore to argue. After all through my FB adjustment- if indeed my wife was out of status, it is forgiven anyway. It is good to know that TKD can re-enter US sucesfully. I think that is more proof than just theory (IO's word).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That IO was an idiot. Anyway, it's a moot point now. And given that the I-485 was filed before the H1B expired, don't worry about traveling with AP. I did it with no problem, so did many others here.
 
Thanks Jack for assurance on travel. I concur on your assesment. I also remembered telling the officer, if my wife is out of status, then why USCIS approve her Advance Parole at all. It is like giving it out but you can not really use it to enter - it is useless then. He explained that USCIS always granted every one AP. But, my mood throughout the interview was already dissapointment, since within 1 minute of talking to us, he said that he can not recommend any approval since he need to merge the two EB and FB file (though I withdrew the EB already). Now, my wife's case is in his hand, and this waiting period for merging multiple 485 files looks like going to be a long one. The IO was more positive actually. He said that 1 to 1.5 month should be the time frame for us to get a result - he then collected the I-94 and told us to do info pass if by then no result. Though, the more I read (this forum), I think the IO statement is seem to be inaccurate from reality.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks Jack for assurance on travel. I concur on your assesment. I also remembered telling the officer, if my wife is out of status, then why USCIS approve her Advance Parole at all. It is like giving it out but you can not really use it to enter - it is useless then. He explained that USCIS always granted every one AP.
He does have a point there. They almost always grant the AP even though it is useless for some individuals. I think they secretly want people who have been here illegally or are otherwise inadmissible to take the AP (with a false sense of security) and leave the country so they can refuse them entry, rather than having to deport them or forgive their overstay.

Similarly, they will schedule consular interviews for people inside the US who would be subject to the 3-year or 10-year ban due to illegal presence. Then when they show up at the consulate, they reject them due to the ban. In many cases they could have stayed in the US to pursue the I-485 to completion, but they want overstayers to leave the US rather than be forgiven, so they're not going to advise you against consular processing in such a scenario.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top