Left employer after Green card

[DreamUSA]

He did not work for them before. He worked for company A and got GC from company B and both the companies are owned by the same family (wife (company B) and husband (Company A))

The common family ownership does not mean much unless A and B were part of and controled by the Holding Company which was registered /filed with USCIS and US IRS AND The sponsor for GC.

Your friend really need to look to overall situation....and clearly state the fact situation and compare to what he/she previously stated to USCIS vs Reality.If there are a lot discrepencies, then there is a risk...may , he/she should postopne N-400...until he/she gets facts situation right....frankly, i am not I-485 expert, but the entire I-485 case looks a bit suspect to me. Why company A did not sponsor GC (if he has such a good relationship with owners) ? Was Company B was a used as "shell" company to get GC?

As I stated earlier, creating a document to make to appear things the you prefer (reporting not existent layoff, etc...) is a fraud...In fact, reputable employer will not and shall not engage in that activity.

 

[sanjoseaug20]

The common family ownership does not mean much unless A and B were part of and controled by the Holding Company which was registered /filed with USCIS and US IRS AND The sponsor for GC.

Your friend really need to look to overall situation....and clearly state the fact situation and compare to what he/she previously stated to USCIS vs Reality.If there are a lot discrepencies, then there is a risk...may , he/she should postopne N-400...until he/she gets facts situation right....frankly, i am not I-485 expert, but the entire I-485 case looks a bit suspect to me. Why company A did not sponsor GC (if he has such a good relationship with owners) ? Was Company B was a used as "shell" company to get GC?

As I stated earlier, creating a document to make to appear things the you prefer (reporting not existent layoff, etc...) is a fraud...In fact, reputable employer will not and shall not engage in that activity.

I agree, and this sounds suspect on the face of it. And this is why I recommended having a clean 5 calendar years with no such doubt on records before filing for N400. If you / friend think otherwise, and can prove it, definitely go ahead sooner.

 

[Kat999]

I agree, and this sounds suspect on the face of it. And this is why I recommended having a clean 5 calendar years with no such doubt on records before filing for N400. If you / friend think otherwise, and can prove it, definitely go ahead sooner.

Thank you guys. Based on the forum feed back, my friend got more nervous and he thinks the best option is to withdraw the N400 or don't show up for fingerprints which in turn suspends the N400 application and as sanjoseaug20 mentioned wait for 6 months to have a clean 5 calendar year years on employement history and re-apply. He can expect finger printing any time.

Do you guys see any problems by not showing up for finger printing and further process, can he reapply a new N400 after 10 months or so.