Search results

  1. B

    good news.........More entries will be selected in early October 2012

    You seem quite obsessed which is not healthy. If you put in your DV2012 number (yes 2012 not 2013), you will see they use exactly the same message -- "More entries will be selected in early October 2012"..... So that message with the word "will" appears for both DV2012 and DV2013. Therefore...
  2. B

    hidden winners 2012....................still possible!!!

    Ok thank you very much, that's helpful. If you want help with your case, I suggest you post on the AOS 2012 thread. Lots of people in there going/went through your type of application and you will undoubtedly find lots of experienced people to answer your questions! Good luck, and don't...
  3. B

    hidden winners 2012....................still possible!!!

    Did you originally check after the re-draw in July last year (after the first results were voided) and got a "Not Selected" message?
  4. B

    hidden winners 2012....................still possible!!!

    No need for such language. This is an internet forum. Can you really expect people to believe what is an extraordinary news if you don't supply evidence?
  5. B

    Please help...

    From your previous posts http://forums.immigration.com/showthread.php?326402-Change-of-Marital-Status...-Very-Confusing!!!&p=2321579&highlight=#post2321579...
  6. B

    New Results of DV 2012 be discussed here with poll

    Don't forget we are barely into 6 hours since the checking opened. Many people have not checked and in particular, for the African and third world countries (this is not a racist comment) many people do not have ready internet access. What surprised me most about the first round results back in...
  7. B

    Winning notification dated May, 1? WTF??

    Sweetie, everything's in their computers! If you ain't on the list, you're not in. If it was so easy as turning up with a piece of paper, I'll be using Photoshop now :)
  8. B

    Winning notification dated May, 1? WTF??

    Why is it not possible? There is nothing to prevent it. The original results were rescinded. They can put any date they want.
  9. B

    Winning notification dated May, 1? WTF??

    I don't see anything peculiar about it. The original notification date as always planned is May 1. The first lot results were annulled so they are wiped off and never in existence. Today's new winners now stand as May 1 winners as intended.
  10. B

    DV-2012 July WAS A SCAM

    Cool Pizarro! I look forward to Pizarro v Hillary Rodham Clinton :-) Relax friend ... if it's not to be, it's not to be.... Can understand your disappointment though. 3rd time nil for me. All the best.
  11. B

    2012 dv lottery result

    No one called you a scammer but the website www.dv-confirmation.com is so obviously a scam site. 1) Asks for money (I love this sentence there "If those people who had lost their confirmation numbers can donate some money") 2) Promises to help retrieve confirmation number when DOS has already...
  12. B

    New Results of DV 2012 be discussed here with poll

    With the court case over, no doubt you will press them again since there's finality to this whole situation now. They have no right at all to keep the fee (unless you've won again of course) and it was also expressly in Donahue's statement it would be refunded. So perhaps they've been dragging...
  13. B

    DV 2012 Applicants and Lucky Winners

    That's the way it's always been. The default is NOT selected all the time, no matter what's entered. But if someone has actually been selected and he keys in the right info, then the winning message comes up.
  14. B

    Result of the court hearing 12th July 2010

    Reputation? What reputation. The guy is known as an ambulance chaser. No other law firm wanted to touch this case. Lots of other lawyers were consulted and no one wanted to know. As for going forward and continuing with the case, the judge rejected the claim for class certification. If they...
  15. B

    Result of the court hearing 12th July 2010

    No more courtroom action according to the second Facebook page --- facebook.com/dvlottery
  16. B

    Result of the court hearing 12th July 2010

    No one here heard for ourselves what precisely what said at the hearing. Egor used the term "inaccurate" and everyone has quickly jumped to the conclusion that Amin is "lying" which I find pretty ridiculous to contemplate. Could just mean the declaration was not sufficiently complete, needing...
  17. B

    Litigation update this week

    It is precisely because I have seen all your posts I, and I am sure others, have come to the conclusion you are what I said you are. How ironical you say "res ipsa loquitur" .....the thing speaks for itself...... everything about you speaks for yourself. No kidding Sherlock...anyone would...
  18. B

    Litigation update this week

    A p**ck. Need a dictionary for that o great spouting wannabe lawyer?
  19. B

    Litigation update this week

    Maybe because you come across as a pin head (justified in my view).
  20. B

    Beware with being ask to sponsor!

    Could have fooled me. Everytime I come to this forum, I see nothing but your posts plastered everywhere.
Top