Hi all
My NIW case is very strange. Please give me some information or comments. Thank you.
I am applying NIW in the wireless as a research engineer. In my orginal petition, I include CV , basic everything as usual. BTW, I have a lawyer do that for me. Initially, I send 6 recommendation letters there. one from my Ph.D advisor, one from my current colleague, and 4 from total independent professors who don't know me before. These 4 guys including IEEE fellow, professors from Austin, UM Amherest etc.
Then I got RFE last November. The language is almost same as the guys who posted below. I send over new RFE on 02/05. Now, the problem comes. My lawyer didn't provide a lot to answer the INS' question such as what is my research plan etc (I think this maybe a BIG problem now, I think I trust them to much). In stead, they argue the INS with the law saying since there are 4 totoal independent expert testifying that I am good, the INS can not say I am not. In the new package, my lawyer also includes 3 new reference letter, one from my current boss, 2 more independent experts from universities such as U - Washington. Also, he includes the proof that I am a reviewer for the IEEE Transcantion and 16 previous AAO cases to say they should approve my case.
Today, after two weeks, when I check the status online, it is said that "On February 19, 2003, this case was transferred to our Administrative Appeals Office for review. That office will notify you of any further action taken on this case".
As far as I konw, the proper procedure is that they should first deny my case then I can decide whether I should appeal to AAO or not. However, I didn't receive anything at this moment. It is just strange.
Could anyone comment on this and what do you think I did wrong?
Thanks
richard
My NIW case is very strange. Please give me some information or comments. Thank you.
I am applying NIW in the wireless as a research engineer. In my orginal petition, I include CV , basic everything as usual. BTW, I have a lawyer do that for me. Initially, I send 6 recommendation letters there. one from my Ph.D advisor, one from my current colleague, and 4 from total independent professors who don't know me before. These 4 guys including IEEE fellow, professors from Austin, UM Amherest etc.
Then I got RFE last November. The language is almost same as the guys who posted below. I send over new RFE on 02/05. Now, the problem comes. My lawyer didn't provide a lot to answer the INS' question such as what is my research plan etc (I think this maybe a BIG problem now, I think I trust them to much). In stead, they argue the INS with the law saying since there are 4 totoal independent expert testifying that I am good, the INS can not say I am not. In the new package, my lawyer also includes 3 new reference letter, one from my current boss, 2 more independent experts from universities such as U - Washington. Also, he includes the proof that I am a reviewer for the IEEE Transcantion and 16 previous AAO cases to say they should approve my case.
Today, after two weeks, when I check the status online, it is said that "On February 19, 2003, this case was transferred to our Administrative Appeals Office for review. That office will notify you of any further action taken on this case".
As far as I konw, the proper procedure is that they should first deny my case then I can decide whether I should appeal to AAO or not. However, I didn't receive anything at this moment. It is just strange.
Could anyone comment on this and what do you think I did wrong?
Thanks
richard