Guys and Gals,
Here is an excerpt from immigration-law.com regarding how the USCIS has very successfully reduced processing time to "6-months" for adjustment of status to Permanent Resident .. the only thing missing is the that thousands of cases have simply been retrogressed and do not count towards a backlog .. so basically the USCIS will hand you the GC within a few months IF YOU CAN EVEN APPLY because almost everything is retrogressed .. this situation is so sad that its almost funny ... here I am waiting for over 5 years and they are trying to tell me that the DOS in partnership with USCIS has successfully reduced backlogs so as to approve cases within 6 months ... sometimes I just can't believe that this is even happening ...
---- The USCIS has been really working hard to achieve the President Bush's $500 million Immigration Benefits 6-Month Processing Time in five years. The agengy has now three months to reach the target deadline. The latest monthly statistical report indicates that the backlog has been reduced from millions to lower six digit figures. The agency deserves commend for the achievement.
--- However, when it comes to the EB-485 applications, there are a huge number of applicants who have been experiencing delays not because of the visa number retrogression but because of the processing delays. Without doubt, some of these delays have been caused by the namechecks and security clearance delays. It is hoped that the agency clears out these cases from their shelves as soon as possible. The agency is also urged to clarify the definition of "6-month processing time" of the President's commitment. At this point, there is ambiguity as to how the six month is measured. The agency has been working on the electronic filing and processing system and procedural and organization reengineering to achieve in part the President's commitment to the 6-month processing time. However, it appears that 100% achievement of the goal by the set target date may not be do-able, depending on the definition of the term.
Here is an excerpt from immigration-law.com regarding how the USCIS has very successfully reduced processing time to "6-months" for adjustment of status to Permanent Resident .. the only thing missing is the that thousands of cases have simply been retrogressed and do not count towards a backlog .. so basically the USCIS will hand you the GC within a few months IF YOU CAN EVEN APPLY because almost everything is retrogressed .. this situation is so sad that its almost funny ... here I am waiting for over 5 years and they are trying to tell me that the DOS in partnership with USCIS has successfully reduced backlogs so as to approve cases within 6 months ... sometimes I just can't believe that this is even happening ...
---- The USCIS has been really working hard to achieve the President Bush's $500 million Immigration Benefits 6-Month Processing Time in five years. The agengy has now three months to reach the target deadline. The latest monthly statistical report indicates that the backlog has been reduced from millions to lower six digit figures. The agency deserves commend for the achievement.
--- However, when it comes to the EB-485 applications, there are a huge number of applicants who have been experiencing delays not because of the visa number retrogression but because of the processing delays. Without doubt, some of these delays have been caused by the namechecks and security clearance delays. It is hoped that the agency clears out these cases from their shelves as soon as possible. The agency is also urged to clarify the definition of "6-month processing time" of the President's commitment. At this point, there is ambiguity as to how the six month is measured. The agency has been working on the electronic filing and processing system and procedural and organization reengineering to achieve in part the President's commitment to the 6-month processing time. However, it appears that 100% achievement of the goal by the set target date may not be do-able, depending on the definition of the term.
Last edited by a moderator: