The last news I know of

pralay

Registered Users (C)
01/25/03: DHS Scheduled to Start Immigration Services on March 1, 2003


The Secretary of DHS announced that the DHS would start the immigration adjudications and services function on March 1, 2003. Pending the transition, the adjudications of nonimmigrant and immigrant cases at the field offices have remained de fact halt or at snail pace. Despite the INS HQ announcement that I-485 freeze had been lifted, the Service Centers' processing times reports reflect that EB-485 remains at halt except a handful of cases that have been transferred to the local district offices. Additionally, for an unknown reasons, the Service Centers have been adjudicating non-skilled workers cases for both I-140 (EB-3GW) petitions and I-129 nonimmigrant petitions (such as H-2A and H-2B) and the immigrant and nonimmigrant petitions for professional occupations such as I-140 in EB-1, EB-2, EB-31 and I-129 (H-1B) show a snail-pace of adjudications.

There is no confirmed information about the sources of this continuing freeze or halt or snail-pace adjudication of certain types of cases, but it is obvious that certain types of cases, especially I-485, I-129 H-1B, I-140, will not move ahead in a speed which the immigrant community wants to see pending the transition. Apparently, such dragnet is not limited to the Service Centers. Reportedly, the on-going special registrations take away a substantial amount of the local INS district offices' adjudication resources, and probably until the special registration is over on March 28, 2003, the adjudication at the local district offices is also expected to experience a substantial slow-down.

One good news is looming up, though. Unconfirmed sources indicate that the family-based I-130/I-485 and naturalization cases will be taken away from the local district offices to the Missouri Service Center as early as June 2003. Currently these cases are filed at the local INS district offices. Once this change takes place, the local district offices' function may be restricted to interview and fingerprinting when it comes to the immigration services function. The nationalization of processing of the family-based green card applications and naturalization applications will at least remove a long line of people on the ground of the government buildings in the dawn and in the cold and in the heat.
 
Nice cut and paste

I just think it would have been nice to mention where you got the news. If I'm not mistaken they come from www.immigration-law.com, a fine place to get up to date immigration news. I am a regular visitor of the breaking news section.

I thought that using material without citing the source is akin to plagiarism. I know the intention here was not to plagiarize. It's just that I feel frustrated of so many people quoting news from that website without mentioning the source of the news, it seems unfair for the guy who puts those news up daily.

My 2 cents.
 
Huracan,

A better argument for the case by stating that without posting the source it is very difficult for people to believe in the news. We all know that news emmiting from www.immigration-law.com, www.murthy.com, www.shausterman.com, www.usabal.com, are more likely to be true since they are attorneys and have an inside ear with INS and AILA, also people can go to their websites and confirm stories. As compared to making a case for plagarism, which in this case has no value, since no one claims that they talked to the IIO and/or the INS to obtain the news! :)
 
Give me a break!!!!!

To Huracan,
I should have mentioned the source
(forgot to do it after cut and paste, in hurry). Thanks for
reminding.

And "plagiarizing"!!! Give me a break. I don't know what so
say. As far I know it's a "forum" and used by us for exchanging
informations and help each other
- and it's used for only that purpose (as far I know).
Here nobody claimed anything saying "I know something
that nobody else knows". If you already know, just ignore it
and pass on to next thread. But let other people know. Not many
people surf all the immigration sites (even I don't do. I mainly
come this site).

Yes, "140_takes_4ever" absolutely right. When you don't mention
the source, the authenticity of the news is in question. But
what is that plagiarizing about?

- Pralay
 
My apologies

I thought I had made clear that I wasn't really thinking you were trying to plagiarize. It was just an analogy. I admit it was not probably a good analogy. I didn't want to pick on you. I guess I just concentrated all of my complaints about similar cases on my reply to your message.

Again, if you re-read my reply it clearly says that I don't think your message is guilty of plagiarism.

In a conciliatory note :) i'd like to say that I welcome your posting of such interesting news. I agree with you that crossposting is frequently useful because people don't look in all the websites. However I would encourage everyone who crossposts from other immigration websites to include the source or URL for verification, trust, and respect for whomever produced the news.

My 2 cents, and again my apologies for having offended you.
 
Top