THE AC21 Letter . which we are all excited about

eb2_I485_RD0901

Registered Users (C)
The letter from BCIS to an AILA lawyer- I140 revocation and I485 approval

Attached is the AC21 LETTER which has been the major topic of discussion since the Murthy Chat.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
to ALL

But there is nothing new in this case. Please read carefully the sentence,

"Please be aware that this interpretation is being explored within the context of the rulemaking process of AC21."

This means that they are still exploring the interpretation of AC21. For those who have read it carefully, Mr. Hernandez is not stating what we would like to hear. He has merely repeated the argument posed by attorney to defend her client and responding the same with above mentioned sentence. A mere repeating of AC21 statements does not mean he has agreed to them. Please pay attention to words, like

"You cited...”, "The language you cite...".

The attorney has done an excellent job of telling BCIS about AC21 and BCIS (Mr. Hernandez) agrees about these statements BUT still makes the statement that "Please be aware that this interpretation is being explored within the context of the rulemaking process of AC21."

Guys, we all knew about AC21. This is nothing new for us. They are STILL INTERPRETING.....

Can anyone please clarify me based on the letter that they have agreed and interpreted AC21?
 
From www.immigration-law.com

Under the AC 21, 485 waiters are allowed to take new employment 180 days after filing I-485 inasmuch as it is a same or similar occupation. One question which remained a puzzle was what would happen if the employer should revoke the underlying approved I-140 petition. In fact, there have been a number of reports by the immigration lawyers that the Service Centers denied I-485 when underlying I-140 had been revoked by the employer in several instances.
This question has yet to be answered by the yet-to-be-enacted AC 21 regulation, but AILA has reported a letter written by a responsible BCIS official in response to an attorney's inquiry that revocation of the approved I-140 petition by the employer should not affect the pending I-485 application "inasmuch as the revocation took effect after 180 days from the filing of I-485." He opined that the underlying approved I-140 petition and the approved labor certification application would remain valid despite such revocation if it happened after 180 days.
The opinion was expressed in the form of a letter and not even an official memorandum. Accordingly, strictly speaking, the letter does not carry any legally binding force. However, in view of the fact that the officer is in charge of the business division, it should carry some weight for the Service Center adjudicators. Question remains: (1) Would the Service Center reverse their prior denial if people file a motion to reopen or motion to reconsider based on this letter? (2) Since one certified labor certification application can support only one I-140 petition, what happens if the employer files a new I-140 petition to substitute the employee and the new employee applies for I-485 based on the newly approved I-140 petition? The letter still begs a host of questions and it will remain so until the AC 21 regulation is officially enacted.

Hope this explains where we stand with this issue.
 
alsowaiting,

Yes, this is not the "MEMO" that we all are hoping will come out 07/11 i.e Friday , but in the context of the situation this letter shows the underlying intention and thinking of a senior INS officer.

This letter was a response to an individual query back in 2002 , but has just been released to all AILA members on 07/09/2003.

I just hope we see some official "MEMO" tomorrow.
 
from Murthy Chat on 14 July

Chat User : Good evening, Murthy. Any updates on the guideline to approve I-485 if it is pending for more than 180 days?

Attorney Murthy : The BCIS Memo has not yet been released. Most things with the government take much longer than they expect, due to so many levels of approvals and scrutiny. We will, of course, share the latest information with our MurthyBulletin subscribers and on our WebSite as soon as any guidance is released.
 
Here is the news guys

http://www.fragomen.com/index2.html

US IMMIGRATION HEADLINES 08/11/2003 - BCIS Issues Memo on I-485 Portability

August 11, 2003 -- In a memorandum dated August 4, 2003, the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services has issued guidance on I-485 portability in the context of concurrent filing and Section 106(c) of the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act of 200 (AC21).

The memo first summarizes BCIS's interpretation of AC21 § 106(c), stating that if a Form I-140 has been approved and the Form I-485 has been filed and remained unadjudicated for 180 days or more, the approved I-140 will remain valid even if the foreign national changes jobs or employers, as long as the new offer of employment is in the same or similar occupational classification. If the I-485 has been pending for less than 180 days, the approved I-140 does not remain valid with respect to a new offer of employment. The memorandum confirms that the I-140 must be approved for portability to be available.

The memorandum goes on to discuss the effect of revocation or withdrawal of an approved I-140 on a pending I-485. The guidance on this issue is as follows:


According to BCIS, if the employer withdraws the approved Form I-140 on or after the date that the Form I-485 has been pending 180 days, the approved I-140 remains valid under the provisions of Section 106(c) of AC21.
BCIS expects that a foreign national will have submitted evidence that his or her new offer of employment is in the same or similar occupational classification.
If the underlying Form I-140 has been withdrawn and the foreign national has not submitted evidence of a new qualifying offer of employment, the adjudicating officer must issue a Notice of Intent to Deny the pending Form I-485.
If the foreign national timely responds to the Notice with evidence of a qualifying job offer, the BCIS may consider the Form I-140 to remain valid with respect to that offer and regular processing of the I-485 may continue.
If the foreign national timely responds to the Notice but does not establish evidence of a qualifying job offer, the adjudicating officer "may" immediately deny the I-485.
If the foreign national fails to respond or timely respond to the Notice, the adjudicating officer "may" immediately deny the I-485.
If approval of the Form I-140 is revoked or the Form I-140 is withdrawn before the I-485 has been pending for 180 days, the approved I-140 is no longer valid with respect to the new officer of employment and the I-485 may be denied. Prior BCIS guidance indicates that revocations are retroactive to the date that withdrawal was requested by the employer; therefore it is possible that, though a revocation may be effected by BCIS after 180 days have elapsed, it will be deemed to have occurred prior to the 180-day mark if the employer requested withdrawal before that time.

The offer of employment must be in good faith and the employer must have had the intent, at the time the I-140 was approved, to employ the beneficiary upon adjustment. The memo goes on to note that there is no requirement that the beneficiary of the I-140 actually be in employment until permanent residence is authorized and that it is possible for a foreign national to qualify for the provisions of Section 106(c) even if he or she had never been employed by the prior petitioning
 
Top