Supervisor's Review on NIW-RFE?

S

StDyn

Registered Users (C)
My lawyer forwarded an responded email from '140, CSC XII' for the inquiry about my I-140 application.
The response was from 'Center Adjudications Officer, Congressional & Customer Relations Division XII' stated,

The I-140 at question is under supervisor review. Once the supervisor clears
the decision, a transaction notice will be mailed out to the address of record.

My questions are,

(1) Why from 'Congressional & Customer Relations Division XII'? Is it typical divison sends responses?

(2) What's the meaning of 'supervisor's review'? Is it typical procedure or something special?

I desperately beg your opinions.

1/18/05, Filed I-140, I-485 Concurrently
5/20/05, RFE Issued
8/15/05, RFE RD
9/03/05, LUD on I-140 & I-485
9/27/05, Response for the inquiry (above content)
 
'Congressional & Customer Relations Division XII' is typical.

However 'supervisor's review' is not a very good sign.

What are your qualifications?
 
allaboutgc,

I don't think 'supervisor's review' is a good sign. I even saw in CSC's website that supervisor's review will be conducted before they confirm denial....
Do you have any specific information about this case?

My qualifications are not so good (and that's why I'm jittery)

Ph.D. in foregin country
Three years of Research Associate in good state university.
27 papers including 3 journal papers.

Current position is Senior Engineer of US Government Contractor.
Participated in several numbers of projects sponsored U.S. Dep. of Defense (DoD) and
Managing two projects sponsored by USDoD with Special Security Permit

5 very strong reco letters from U.S. Federal government agents
4 very strong reco letters from foreign government agents
2 very strong reco letters from the presidents of worldwide companies
3 very strong reco letters from the professors of the US state universities
1 descriptive reco letter from US congressman leading DHS Division
1 descriptive reco letter from US GSA (General Security Agency) agent

Papers are not enough but I expected it could be compromised with careers and recos.



allaboutgc said:
'Congressional & Customer Relations Division XII' is typical.

However 'supervisor's review' is not a very good sign.

What are your qualifications?
Click to expand...
 
StDyn said:
allaboutgc,

I don't think 'supervisor's review' is a good sign. I even saw in CSC's website that supervisor's review will be conducted before they confirm denial....
Do you have any specific information about this case?

My qualifications are not so good (and that's why I'm jittery)

Ph.D. in foregin country
Three years of Research Associate in good state university.
27 papers including 3 journal papers.

Current position is Senior Engineer of US Government Contractor.
Participated in several numbers of projects sponsored U.S. Dep. of Defense (DoD) and
Managing two projects sponsored by USDoD with Special Security Permit

5 very strong reco letters from U.S. Federal government agents
4 very strong reco letters from foreign government agents
2 very strong reco letters from the presidents of worldwide companies
3 very strong reco letters from the professors of the US state universities
1 descriptive reco letter from US congressman leading DHS Division
1 descriptive reco letter from US GSA (General Security Agency) agent

Papers are not enough but I expected it could be compromised with careers and recos.
Click to expand...

I AM REALLY SURPRISED. YOU HAVE EXCELLENT CV, however I strongly feel that your NIW petition is not drafted properly. YOu can try next time in EB1. You must have failed to show that how your work is important to US national interest, which is key of NIW success. Any way did you read famous New York State Transport NIW case. Any attorney who files NIW takes 2-3 points from that case. You can write personal mesage to me.

---------------
I am not an attorney, and not paralegal, but filed my NIW and it is approved in 12 working days without attorney services, when I filed it in mid Sept 2005. I am reading about GC filing and J1 wavier from last 2 years. I am from India.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Additional qualification

I forgot one more qualification,

I am primary inventor of three patents.....




shankara21cen said:
I AM REALLY SURPRISED. YOU HAVE EXCELLENT CV, however I strongly feel that your NIW petition is not drafted properly. YOu can try next time in EB1. You must have failed to show that how your work is important to US national interest, which is key of NIW success. Any way did you read famous New York State Transport NIW case. Any attorney who files NIW takes 2-3 points from that case. You can write personal mesage to me.

---------------
I am not an attorney, and not paralegal, but filed my NIW and it is approved in 12 working days without attorney services, when I filed it in mid Sept 2005. I am reading about GC filing and J1 wavier from last 2 years. I am from India.
Click to expand...
 
StDyn said:
allaboutgc,

I don't think 'supervisor's review' is a good sign. I even saw in CSC's website that supervisor's review will be conducted before they confirm denial....
Do you have any specific information about this case?

My qualifications are not so good (and that's why I'm jittery)

Ph.D. in foregin country
Three years of Research Associate in good state university.
27 papers including 3 journal papers.

Current position is Senior Engineer of US Government Contractor.
Participated in several numbers of projects sponsored U.S. Dep. of Defense (DoD) and
Managing two projects sponsored by USDoD with Special Security Permit

5 very strong reco letters from U.S. Federal government agents
4 very strong reco letters from foreign government agents
2 very strong reco letters from the presidents of worldwide companies
3 very strong reco letters from the professors of the US state universities
1 descriptive reco letter from US congressman leading DHS Division
1 descriptive reco letter from US GSA (General Security Agency) agent

Papers are not enough but I expected it could be compromised with careers and recos.
Click to expand...


just out of curiosity: Why didn't you try EB-1 OR, which I think is much easier than NIW ?
 
honkman said:
just out of curiosity: Why didn't you try EB-1 OR, which I think is much easier than NIW ?
Click to expand...

Yoy may change lawyer and file MTR or appeal. I think it should work.
You need to prove how your work is in US interest. It is very EASY to prove in your CASE.
 
honkman,

I am working for a DoD contractor- type of privatized consulting company, not an academic institute. I didn't think my title matched very well with extraordinary research. And as you can see in my profile, I don't have very strong paper accomplishments. Just three of the papers were published in not so high-valued journal. All the rest of them are conference papers.

That's why I didn't touch EB1-OR.


honkman said:
just out of curiosity: Why didn't you try EB-1 OR, which I think is much easier than NIW ?
Click to expand...
 
Thank you shakara21cen,

I am planning to file EB1-OR and EB2-NIW at the same time when I get official denial letter. Still I expect something happens at the supervisor's level.
I can file new NIW after I receive official denial letter. But I'm thinking of PERM as a back-up.

shankara21cen said:
Yoy may change lawyer and file MTR or appeal. I think it should work.
You need to prove how your work is in US interest. It is very EASY to prove in your CASE.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top