to answer gilbert's question. my husband is not represented by an attorney nor is his case special in any way (to make one think that something might be wrong). he was granted asylum in late 1995 (without any problems) and applied for adjustment in December 1996 (notice January 1997). he has made many useless trips to our local office over the years, wrote letters to everyone but God, made calls to everyone but God, and every time was told to wait, that everything was fine.
if you remember, back then all asylees adjusting their status had to be interviewed. he's one of them. he had his interview in October 1997 and after that one long period of nothingness till about a month ago when he finally received a letter in the mail asking him to take fingerprints. do you know if those who had their interviews are somehow spared requests for additional evidence? is their situation different in any way. if anything, shouldn't it be easier for them.
why do you ask about the attorney? do you think it would have made a difference. it sickens me if that's the case. i mean, to spend thousands to have someone fill out a few meaningless pages of an application (especially when you have a wife who practically grew up here). well, in any case, i just worry now that the next step will take forever because as i've learned from this forum, some people wait even a year after fingerprinting.
oh, enough of my complaining. i just wish i could help him somehow.
M.