I know you've done a great job with rupnet.com/immigration.. but I have one concern and I hope everyone takes it positively.
Sometimes you've been adding data on rupnet.com yourself ( taking info from this forum). There is a chance that some of those users might already have updated their data on rupnet under ANOTHER NICK NAME. Thus same approval might be getting registered twice .. whereas number of penidng cases do not get updated at the same rate. This makes data less precise ( i know there is always s plus minus % of error.. so why add on top of that?). I think we should let users update data themselves.
No of approvals versus pending cases is a significant analysis that some of us derive from rupnet.com to figure out when will they move onto next month.
I would urge all of you to update rupne.com promptly ( so that greaty-k does not have to do this for you, he/she already has done so much for people in this forum)
Sometimes you've been adding data on rupnet.com yourself ( taking info from this forum). There is a chance that some of those users might already have updated their data on rupnet under ANOTHER NICK NAME. Thus same approval might be getting registered twice .. whereas number of penidng cases do not get updated at the same rate. This makes data less precise ( i know there is always s plus minus % of error.. so why add on top of that?). I think we should let users update data themselves.
No of approvals versus pending cases is a significant analysis that some of us derive from rupnet.com to figure out when will they move onto next month.
I would urge all of you to update rupne.com promptly ( so that greaty-k does not have to do this for you, he/she already has done so much for people in this forum)