I have a situation where I work for one consulting company (Company A) who is sponsoring my GC application. The company is in good shape. The end client (Company B) where I am working currently wants to hire me full time basis.
My I-485 was filed in Oct 2002 by Company A.
My question is:
Is there any added extra risk to use AC21. Whole GC process is risky, you never know what INS officer thinks and how he/ she acts. Does using AC21 increases that risk, or the risk stays the same?
If the risk increases then I will avoid using AC21 and continue with Company A till I get my GC (Hopefully in next 6 months). Company A has enough business /funds to keep me employed and pay my salary for foreseeable future.
Company B is bigger corporation. But has acquired another big company and I expect some organizational changes in next 6-8 months. Which means I might even loose the job if I join as permanent employee.
I have read somewhere that AC21 still does not have the written regulation. Which means if INS denies I-485 then it can not be appealed, even by lawyer.
Thanks,
Neeyo
My I-485 was filed in Oct 2002 by Company A.
My question is:
Is there any added extra risk to use AC21. Whole GC process is risky, you never know what INS officer thinks and how he/ she acts. Does using AC21 increases that risk, or the risk stays the same?
If the risk increases then I will avoid using AC21 and continue with Company A till I get my GC (Hopefully in next 6 months). Company A has enough business /funds to keep me employed and pay my salary for foreseeable future.
Company B is bigger corporation. But has acquired another big company and I expect some organizational changes in next 6-8 months. Which means I might even loose the job if I join as permanent employee.
I have read somewhere that AC21 still does not have the written regulation. Which means if INS denies I-485 then it can not be appealed, even by lawyer.
Thanks,
Neeyo