Retrogression .. some guesses ...

saras76

Banned
Guys and Gals,

It has now been over a week since this retrogression and I have had time to visit numerous sites and almost all the different threads in this forum. From what I have read so far I can only guess the following reasons for the USCIS to retrogress the dates to 98.

1. The USCIS is terrified of the number of labor cases in the BackLog Elimination Centers. They are being very cautious because the initial assessment of the number of cases in these centers is frightening. USCIS is being over cautious and has thrown back the date to 98 for Indian EB3s because they are certain that there will be no labor from 98 in these centers. They will keep a close watch on the BECs and depending on the number of cases that come out of them and the PDs of the cases that come out of these centers, the PD dates will either move or stay the same. I am pretty confident that there are very few EB3 cases from 98-2000. So the dates should get to 2001 fairly quickly. Maybe as early as Jan 06.

2. USCIS is terrified of the PERM process because they fear that their centers will be flooded with people filing 485 applications. Te be on the safe side they have thrown back the dates to 98. They have ensured that there are no new 485 cases till they get a handle on the BEC cases.

3. There is also a move to eliminate labor substitution and the dates have been thrown back to prevent people from "cheating" the system.

Everything points to the fact that this "rash" decision has been made to ensure that the USCIS is not clogged with cases. They have taken the worst case scenario and have made a decision based on that. They have erred on the side of caution as they say.

Logically I just do not see how the dates for EB3 Indians will not get into 2001 by the end of this year. If they don't get there then we know that this is more than mere backlog worries. This may be a policy shift ... we have to keep a close eye on that.

regards,

saras
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One more (may be ) my guess

After the April 2001 pending cases, people in 2001 started realizing that system (labor ) has big time screwed. It was almost grinding halt. Then people started changing the location and started fresh filing. I know so many people who have filed labor 3-4 times. Myself 2 times. Then there was so many lay off and voluntary resignation. Very very few companies have withdrawn these frivolous cases as its Fixed deposit or deep discount bond (buy bond for 5k and get 100k after 20 years scheme).So if they put 45 days rule and eliminate these factious case and it may come up with correct visa requirement. I am not sure whether this is true for other national too.These cases may be the factor too.BTW I don't understand the rational of PERM ,BRC ,USCIS backlog reduction plan , 6months by 2006 etc when PD is 98.If streamlining the system is taking 7 years for GC ,better there be mess.It was definately not taking 7 years.
 
Top