Guys and Gals,
I am sure a lot of you are wondering what the deal is with this retrogression and why it has come to haunt you (especially if you are EB3). I think there is a lot of confusion out there regarding what the whole deal is and how it affects an individuals 485 application. After reading tons of threads and following newletters, this is what I have found.
Until recently all employment based categories were current (EB1, EB2 and EB3). This meant that adequate visa numbers were avaliable for approving a 485 application within either category. For those of you who do not know, a 485 application cannot be approved without a visa number being assigned to it first. There are only a certain number of visas that are alloted each year by the Department of State and until recently enough visa numbers were available for all cases. I think the limited visa numbers are a way of controlling the number of immigrants that are granted GCs. Note that the visa numbers are different for people of different countries. Needless to say, Indian and Chinese citizens face the biggest hurdles because of the limited number of visas and large number of applicants. Now onto the "Retrogression" problem ....
The problem started last year when USCIS instructed all centers to approve concurrently filed 140s and 485s together. Since most of the concurrent cases were from 03 and 04 and the 140 dates were way ahead of the 485 dates, the morons in the centers began to approve all concurrent 03 and 04 cases together neglecting cases from 01,02 and a lot of 03s. This lead to a rapid depletion of visa numbers especially in the EB3 category. What added to this problem was the fact that two centers (CSC and VSC) went on an approval binge and took away so many visa numbers within the span of a few months and that no visa numbers were left for 01,02 and 03 cases. When the great USCIS realized this blunder they were forced to abandon the stupidly implemented "concurrent adjucation" policy and retrogress the Priority Date. Again for those that do not know, for EB3 cases there is a cutoff Priority Date that has been set by USCIS and if the cases PD falls before the cutoff PD then the case will be processed otherwise it will just sit there till its PD crosses the current PD date released by USCIS (the PD of a case is the date the labor cert was filed and can be found on the approved 140 notice). The retrogression was done to ensure that old cases 01,02 and 03 cases got visa numbers and newly filed cases did not eat up the visa numbers. Currently the situation is so bad that they have stopped EB3 adjucation altogether and there are talks of them suspending Eb2 adjucation till October 05 when the new visas will be released. How ridiculous is that ....
I hope the above has shed some light for people who are confused about why their cases are not being adjucated. I always feel that it is better to understand the plight one is in rather than be blind to it. It is also good to know the reasons behind delayed adjucations. This is the only reason I have posted this thread.
All of the above is knowledge I have gathered and I may be wrong in certain parts. However, I am pretty confident that most of what I have described has taken place.
regards,
saras76
I am sure a lot of you are wondering what the deal is with this retrogression and why it has come to haunt you (especially if you are EB3). I think there is a lot of confusion out there regarding what the whole deal is and how it affects an individuals 485 application. After reading tons of threads and following newletters, this is what I have found.
Until recently all employment based categories were current (EB1, EB2 and EB3). This meant that adequate visa numbers were avaliable for approving a 485 application within either category. For those of you who do not know, a 485 application cannot be approved without a visa number being assigned to it first. There are only a certain number of visas that are alloted each year by the Department of State and until recently enough visa numbers were available for all cases. I think the limited visa numbers are a way of controlling the number of immigrants that are granted GCs. Note that the visa numbers are different for people of different countries. Needless to say, Indian and Chinese citizens face the biggest hurdles because of the limited number of visas and large number of applicants. Now onto the "Retrogression" problem ....
The problem started last year when USCIS instructed all centers to approve concurrently filed 140s and 485s together. Since most of the concurrent cases were from 03 and 04 and the 140 dates were way ahead of the 485 dates, the morons in the centers began to approve all concurrent 03 and 04 cases together neglecting cases from 01,02 and a lot of 03s. This lead to a rapid depletion of visa numbers especially in the EB3 category. What added to this problem was the fact that two centers (CSC and VSC) went on an approval binge and took away so many visa numbers within the span of a few months and that no visa numbers were left for 01,02 and 03 cases. When the great USCIS realized this blunder they were forced to abandon the stupidly implemented "concurrent adjucation" policy and retrogress the Priority Date. Again for those that do not know, for EB3 cases there is a cutoff Priority Date that has been set by USCIS and if the cases PD falls before the cutoff PD then the case will be processed otherwise it will just sit there till its PD crosses the current PD date released by USCIS (the PD of a case is the date the labor cert was filed and can be found on the approved 140 notice). The retrogression was done to ensure that old cases 01,02 and 03 cases got visa numbers and newly filed cases did not eat up the visa numbers. Currently the situation is so bad that they have stopped EB3 adjucation altogether and there are talks of them suspending Eb2 adjucation till October 05 when the new visas will be released. How ridiculous is that ....
I hope the above has shed some light for people who are confused about why their cases are not being adjucated. I always feel that it is better to understand the plight one is in rather than be blind to it. It is also good to know the reasons behind delayed adjucations. This is the only reason I have posted this thread.
All of the above is knowledge I have gathered and I may be wrong in certain parts. However, I am pretty confident that most of what I have described has taken place.
regards,
saras76
Last edited by a moderator: