recent approval tread in texas

I doubt this, I have been watching this site for some time, but they do not tell the source of info. But assuming that they get the authentic info from USCIS, Why should they be so many rejections? Most probably these applications might have some basic problems like the right fee amount and things like that, just my assumption. Specially in these matters USCIS used to give a RFE and would still accept the applications, but these days I believe they got clear directives to reject application that are technically at fault. Discretionary powers can doom an application. Most often it is the inappropriate job of the attorneys, which the applicant has to suffer, and most of the contracts that we sign with the attorneys do not spell out these clearly, what if the application is rejected purely based on attorneys fault?
just a thought............
Rama
 
It sounds true rama, what you said!
And what is the difference between rejected and denied. anyway??
 
I believe that an application is rejected before somebody looked at the content of the application. Some of the technicalities on which an application might be rejected are listed below.

Reject Criteria 1:
The first step in Reviewing for Eligibility is that INS must ensure that all
applicable fees are present.

Reject Criteria 2:
If the contractor has identified the application as having an incorrect
signature, INS must review the application to determine whether it should be
rejected.

Reject Criteria 3:
In order to be eligible to request adjustment of status, an applicant must
have an approved Employment-based or Family-based petition. These
petitions validate an applicant’s eligibility under a certain section of law

Reject Criteria 4:
When applying for adjustment of status the applicant must be immediately
eligible for the immigrant visa at the time of filing. If the contractor has
identified a lack of visa availability, INS must review the application to
determine if it should be rejected using the priority date of the immigrant visa
petition.

Reject Criteria 5:
Each Service Center has jurisdiction over (or has the authority to process and
adjudicate) a certain sub-set of the total forms received by the INS.
Jurisdiction is determined by geography and by basis for eligibility. If a form
is not from the area serviced by the Service Center or does not fall under a
special program adjudicated by the Service Center, it cannot be processed
there. Therefore, a check for appropriate jurisdiction must be made. The
following criteria will be used for checking jurisdiction.


Now coming to denial, I believe, if some one gos through the application, i.e your application has passed through all the above mentioned and also some which are not listed (for public view), and then they determine that the evidence that we provide is not sufficient they might ask for some more, even after submitting other supporting evidence. If they are not satisfied, Then they are denied.

Rejection is purely a technical issue, denial is a through review of your application, which might not be in the right visa category.

This is what i think is the difference, I might be totally wrong.
Rama
 
Top