I am litttle apprehensive to asnwer the
part 6)B) emaployment of lat 5 years --occupation column.
It is more technically which will be correct asnwer.
Example:
I worked with same employer more than 8 years and sya from 2001.
1)First on H1B--for 4 years--designation say --software Des...1
2)After GC --for 3 years --designation say ---Sales and CRM consult1.
3)Then after --for 1 years 9 months--designation say--Solution consult1.
Now for the same employer in the Row 1,I have to put
like 2001---to present --which technically true answer in "occupation 'column?
If I mention designation at 3 for all from 2001 to date? is it OK or
do I need to mention all 1)2) 3) separately,as the 'five' years now(90 days before)Spans 2 and 3 completely and a part goes in 1) .though employer is same?
What normally others are doing in similar situation?
part 6)B) emaployment of lat 5 years --occupation column.
It is more technically which will be correct asnwer.
Example:
I worked with same employer more than 8 years and sya from 2001.
1)First on H1B--for 4 years--designation say --software Des...1
2)After GC --for 3 years --designation say ---Sales and CRM consult1.
3)Then after --for 1 years 9 months--designation say--Solution consult1.
Now for the same employer in the Row 1,I have to put
like 2001---to present --which technically true answer in "occupation 'column?
If I mention designation at 3 for all from 2001 to date? is it OK or
do I need to mention all 1)2) 3) separately,as the 'five' years now(90 days before)Spans 2 and 3 completely and a part goes in 1) .though employer is same?
What normally others are doing in similar situation?
Last edited by a moderator: