Que. after GC: JoeF/Gurus Pl. help

N

Need_Info_2003

New Member
Hi,
Something about my greencard. I had applied for my I-485 from Nebraska Service Center. My case got transferred to local INS (San Francisco). Recently, I had a interview at San
Francisco INS, and I got stamped immediately with my temporary evidence of greencard.

Now, I have a following queries in this regard :
(i) How much time it will take for me to get a physical greencard? (Pl. bear it in mind that I had applied from Nebraska INS and I got interviewed at San Francisco INS,and got stamped at SFO INS) I am asking since I have a urgent requirement to change my apartment.
(ii) How soon can I change my employer? I heard that it is safe to change after 6 months, otherwise you may have a problem in citizenship or greencard renewal. Is it true?
(iii) My current salary is very low, compared to what it had been mentioned in my greencard. Will it have an impact on me, in getting a citizenship or greencard renewal?

I would appreciate your inputs. Thanks in advance.
 
A question to JoeF

Your whole GC is based on the salary specified in the LC. After GC approval, you have to get the higher of the salary in the LC and the prevailing wage. If you don't, your employer commits fraud. If you knew beforehand that you would not get the salary, you are commiting fraud. And this is of course a grave risk to your GC. So, talk with your employer to make sure that you get paid what they said they would pay in the LC.


JoeF:

It is true that the employer commits fraud if he does not pay the prevailing wage. What could an H1-B visa hoder do to prevent or avoid it? If she or he says something, the employer will buy a return ticket very fast and make sure you are on the plane. You know they always could say "Bad performance at the job" as a reason for termination and find a few bugs in your code.
 
THEN WHY is BCIS NOT ASKING FOR ATLEAST ONE PAYCHECK GREATER OR LESSER THAT THAT CLAIMED ON THE ETAa&B FORM (LABOR CERT)? sO WHERE IS THAT CONTINUATION OF THE JOB BEING VERIFIED?
 
Then you are not analysing the situation and the applicapable rules in the right perspective.

If and IF only the there is a VERIFICATION of the paychecks then only FRAUD comes into picture.

Any way if BCIS STARTS doing that verification THE WHOLE process of this gc/h1/labor becomes totally unattractive to the us employers and a potential situation arises where no employer will show any inclination to do this gc/h1/labor process.


I wish AN EMPLOYEE in this whole country had the power to FORCE an employer to pay him a certain amount and force the same employee to sponsor a gc/h1/labor .That would be heaven ON EARTH.

No I'am NOT a troll just analising /intrepreting the applicapable rules .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can call you something worse than a TROLL. I'am being decent.

ANYWAY you never answered my question.VERIFICATION of the PAY checks!Why is it NOT being done at ANY places.As that needs to be DONE at ALL POINTS/stages of the process IF the FRAUD needs to be REVEALED .That is the ONLY way to proove tha FRAUD . Then there is no way you can call/create that FRAUD as it NEVER existed /exists REALLY. Just the way lawyers want to PROLONG their CONSULTING TIME and SQUEEZE MORE DOLLARS from the innocent clients.

The labor doesnt go through without the PROPER documentation then why NOT the paychecks DOCUMENTATION NOT being REQUIRED at all.

This ISSUE has to be sorted out Or else there is a FAULTin your pointing the FRAUD being involved by quitting within less than 6 month after the I-485 approval.

Now IF the employer COMPLAINS to BCIS/LABOR DEPT about the employee leaving real soon after getting the I-485 approved THEN there may be a problem even which I sincerely doubt as the costs and times of filing that case with the BCIS potentially might be tto much COMPARED to the costs of hiring and sponsoring another employee.


**************
Any way if BCIS STARTS doing that verification THE WHOLE process of this gc/h1/labor becomes totally unattractive to the us employers and a potential situation arises where no employer will no longer show any inclination to do this gc/h1/labor process for an alien employee.


***************
 
CORRECTION for your redundant thoughts--Ask the Congress Write to your congressman/senators/The president to look into thris IMPORTANT ISSUE of VERYFYING the pay stubs AT ALL stages during this whole gc process.

NOT

the BCIS.

That should correct this issue.HOWEVER WHEN/IF corrected ,

**********


THE WHOLE process of this gc/h1/labor becomes totally unattractive to the us employers and a potential situation arises where no employer will no longer show any inclination to do this gc/h1/labor process for an alien employee.


*********

THAT is MY POINT .GET THAT!
 
YA right Thats all you can come up with just indecent words NO APPROPRIATE/FITTING/MEANINGFUL ANSWERS to my question.

********

VERIFICATION of the PAY checks after the approval og the I-485!Why is it NOT being done at ANY places.As that needs to be DONE at ALL POINTS/STAGES of the process FOR ONE AND ALL IRRESPECTIVE of anything-- IF the FRAUD(as you term it ) needs to be REVEALED .




WHY NOT???????????????????????

*********

I can understand as why--because

WHEN/IF that happens THEN
**********


THE WHOLE process of this gc/h1/labor becomes totally unattractive/useless/purpose less of being able of hiring cheaper/convenient labor in USA to the us employers and a potential situation arises where us employers will no longer show any inclination/interest to do this gc/h1/labor process for an alien employee.They would br forced to hire the local labor that is more expensive than these alien labor of which there is abundancy.Plus there is no paper work/documentation that is lenghthy and tedious with lots of twists and turns.Possibly the usa employers would loose money .

That is the whole purpose of all of this gc process.Nothing wrong no fraud involved as bcis is checking all that needs to be checked as per the law during and afterr the approvals.


*********

You get that point in to your head.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top