Problem entring USA from Canada {212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I)}

Shaikh

Registered Users (C)
Last week my friend and his cousin sister were entering USA to from Buffalo border. Both are citizen of Paksitan and canadian landed immigrants (have applied for Canadian passports 2 months ago).
They have visited me in New York a number of time in last 3 years and never had any problem. This time they were stopped and were taken inside the building and interviewed and cross questioned.
At the end of 2 hour argument/interview session they were refused the entry to USA and were returned to canada along with a paper (I-160A).
The paper has names of both and at the bottom under section "REASONS FOR EXCLUDABILITY OR PAROLE", there is a handwritten code { 212 (a)(7)(A)(i)(I) }
He was told that you are being barred to enter USA for 3 to 5 years and she was also told that you could enter USA when you have acquired canadian citizenship.
Any idea what this code means? In future can they cross the border without problems? Do they need to consult an attorney (USA attorney or Canadian attorney)?
Any input would be appreciated.
 
Here's your answer!!

http://www.americanlaw.com/exclude8.html

http://www.myimmigration.net/visas/inadmissibility/212a7/212a7A/

http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/efoia/ocij/oppm97/97-3.pdf


If you look at the 3rd link, "Introduction Section" you will see that "212(a)(7) (lack of proper documents) shall be ordered removed from the United States by an officer of the INS without referral for hearing before an Immigration Judge."

http://www.jdmontaglaw.com/articles/articles_8.html

I am not sure if the Attorney will be able to help your friend, but I guess there is no harm in consulting an attorney.
I guess your friend arguing could have pissed the INS/Customs officer?

Good Luck!!
Good Luck!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Verbal Barr not a written one.

The I-160 does not say anything about "barred", this was just a verbal remark from one of the officer. The paper just has the names and the code written on it.
So at this point we are also assuming that no barr was imposed.
 
Top