unitednations,
Actually, my big issue is 'Ability to Pay' not educational stuff.
My first I-140 & Appeal was denied in 03/2004 as the company's financials are hopelessly bad with losses and liabilities in Y01 &02. However, since later in 2003, company recovered from losses and making profits ~50k and keeping my Y04 pay-roll up-to-date with 90K(LC salry)
So, lawyer re-filed I-140/485 with Y03 tax retuns/financials and pay-stubs in 06/2004 hoping that USCIS may be kind this time.
Thinking that there is a strong possibility of RFE 'expecting in 01/2005' on prior company financials with latest W2s. So, my plan is to use AC21 keeping my Y04 W2= LC salary and switching to new employer in early Y05 hoping that USCIS won't deny my case out-right with prior history of company losses.
So, basically, my only hope is AC21 and counting on it as you replied in your thread before ....
apprecited your insight...
----------
LC AD: 04/2002
First I-140-> ND:06/2002 RFE:02/03 Denial 04/02 appealed: 08/03 Denial: 03/2004
All RFEs about 'Ability to Pay /Inadequate financials'
Second I-140: RD:06/04/2004 with Y03 financials and latest pay-stubs
I-485: RD: 07/04
EAD: AD: 08/04
--------------------------------------------
unitednations said:
I agree with your new attorney. You can definitely expect an RFE. Problem is nothing has changed from the year that you needed to meet ability to pay. I don't see what you have to lose but everything to gain. 140 could be approved from old employer or in 140 RFE response you could send documents and at the same time invoke ac21. I don't see much of a downside for you to change employers after 485 pending more than 180 days.
Just keep in mind that you would need to stretch out response to RFE to make sure 485 has been outstanding for more than 180 days. Therefore, it would seem that as long as you get RFE after 90 days of 485 outstanding and then take full 90 days to respond you would cross 180 days and could use portability. Thing to watch out for is if in the remote chance uscis sends denial notice right away instead of sending RFE.
Another member Naanshi is in similar situation as yours although he didn't use same labor/company. In his response to RFE he sent in financial documents and at the same time invoked ac21. This was last month and he hasn't heard anything.
Key issue in all of this is that the 140 at the time of filing has to be "bona fide"; which in my mind says that it needs to be approvable. However, one could make the argument that ability to pay needs to be met by the ultimate employer and not a combination of the two employers.
I imagine you have been following the other boards and see how much discussion this is taking.