Folks,
I need some help or guidance here.
Here\'s my Information :
PD : 03/08/2001
My 140 is been approved for CP on Dec 11 2000 , I had applied for AOS and my copy of the petition states the same. Now I was in the impression that I have applied for AOS and I was checking my documents to make sure things are fine. Saw the fine prints in the document that it has been approved for CP and has been forwarded to NVC @ New Hamshire
In the mean while I had applied for 485 and here is the information
RD: 03:02:01
AD: 03.12.01
EAC: 01-123-XXXXX
AVM : Always has been " Your case have been received ...."
I got my EAD and AP in the meanwhile and also I got my FP notice too and it was completed in the month of August.
So I called the NVC number and checked my 140 information and its said that it has send the Packet 3 information to my lawyer and I never heard from my lawyer that he receieved any of this information.
Now my question :
a. Are there folks in the same situation ?
b. Any suggestions or ideas on this situation ?
c. Is it worth calling IIO to straight this out ?
Help
I need some help or guidance here.
Here\'s my Information :
PD : 03/08/2001
My 140 is been approved for CP on Dec 11 2000 , I had applied for AOS and my copy of the petition states the same. Now I was in the impression that I have applied for AOS and I was checking my documents to make sure things are fine. Saw the fine prints in the document that it has been approved for CP and has been forwarded to NVC @ New Hamshire
In the mean while I had applied for 485 and here is the information
RD: 03:02:01
AD: 03.12.01
EAC: 01-123-XXXXX
AVM : Always has been " Your case have been received ...."
I got my EAD and AP in the meanwhile and also I got my FP notice too and it was completed in the month of August.
So I called the NVC number and checked my 140 information and its said that it has send the Packet 3 information to my lawyer and I never heard from my lawyer that he receieved any of this information.
Now my question :
a. Are there folks in the same situation ?
b. Any suggestions or ideas on this situation ?
c. Is it worth calling IIO to straight this out ?
Help