sm11299 said:
mvinays,
Thanks for the quick response.
Does any of these options
1) change my PD ?
2) change my category (EB2 to EB3) ? I have masters degree.
3) which option is better & why ?
Thanks,
sm11299
1) It looks like the DOL (BEC) is giving you a chance to retain your PD. By just re-advertising Or by amending your 750A , you will be able to keep the same PD.
2) EB2 or EB3 gets decided by what is mentioned on Item 15 of ETA Form 750A. If this item says that the min. job requirment is either MS+0 or BS+5, then you will be considered for EB2 channel at the I-140 stage. Any min. job requirement below MS+0 or BS+5 will push you down to EB3 at I-140 stage.
See the EB2 equivalency memo below:
http://www.immigrationlinks.com/news/news215.htm
The above memo still holds good even today.
3) This is difficult to decide. You have to think carefully and pick one of the two options. A careful analysis of your labor application would be needed to pick one of the two options. Consult your lawyer to see how best be can draft a rebuttal for the NOF for both Options. Then decide with him/her.
Here is what happened in my case when SWA issued NOF for my LC application. Since my lawyer put some special skill requirements in Item 15 of ETA Form 750 A, SWA mentioned in the NOF that the job requirements on my labor were "
unduly restrictive to US workers" and they wanted a business necessity letter justifying those requiremnts.
My min job req't was BS+0 on the ETA750 that was originally submitted to SWA. I had done my research on EB2 and therefore convinced my lawyer to "amend" or change my ETA 750A from "BS+0" to "MS+0 or BS+5". Since MS+0 or BS+5 was not mentined in my recruitment advertisements (newspaper ads, etc), it was easy in my case for my lawyer to amend the application from "BS+0" to "MS+0 or BS+5". SWA also wanted us to re-post a 10 day notice of filing (which we did), My lawyer then sent a rebuttal letter with newly filled ETA750A/B forms. SWA accepted my lawyer's new ETA 750 application and was convinced with the business necessity letter (which I drafted myself using some technical jargon). Then the SWA approved it and let me keep the same PD. After that, SWA forwarded my case to Philly Regional DOL for final approval (It went to Phily BEC blackhole from there). I went through a nightmare and misery during those 2 months when SWA raised a NOF. Luckily a bad thing turned into a good thing for me (because I could jump from EB3 to EB2 only becuase SWA issued a NOF and my lawyer was able to "amend" the application at that time while subimitting a rebuttal). If SWA hadn't issued a NOF in my case, I would probably be stuck for ever in EB3 retrogression.
Anyways, good luck with your case...Let me know if I can do anything to help you.