new policy on name check delay lawsuits?

taomoon

Registered Users (C)
I am considering filing a lawsuit because I had my Naturalization interview last December, 2005. My application could not be approved pending FBI name check clearance. It is now almost 8 months since the interview and the situation has caused me hardship. I was wondering if anyone out there is familiar with new policy that may affect a person's ability to file. Here are some links:

http://www.visalaw.com/06jun1/13jun106.html

http://www.murthy.com/news/n_delcer.html

They seem to indicate that the government is "trying" to limit such lawsuits. The wording is confusing to me and I am trying to understand whether I should go forward in filing a "writ of mandamus".

Since my interview took place, I have written several letters to USCIS asking for status of my name check. I have also enlisted assistance of Congressman's assistant in my district of Northern Texas. She has been sending inquiries to FBI via FAX and has only received one response in June stating that my name check investigation began last August, 2005 and that FBI could not predict when the investigation would be complete.

For whatever its worth ... I am a woman of Canadian origin. My last name is a very common German name and my first name is a very common French name. I was born and grew up in one city in Canada and have lived for 25 years in the US as a law-abiding, tax-paying resident. I feel really sympathetic to all the Middle-Eastern and East Indian men who seem to be most affected by the FBI name check program. I hope its okay for me to express that I think the FBI name check program is deeply flawed and the process is very vulnerable to all sorts of data corruption.

Mostly I am wondering if I should file the lawsuit and whether new policies will prevent my ability to resolve my own pending application.
 
The USCIS memo / change of policy only affects N-400 applications which have not yet been subjected to interview. They are simply trying to avoid an avalanche of lawsuits by delaying interviews until namecheck is complete.

In your case, since you already had your interview over 240 days ago, you can go ahead and file a 1447b suit or Writ of Mandamus.
 
taomoon said:
I am considering filing a lawsuit because I had my Naturalization interview last December, 2005. My application could not be approved pending FBI name check clearance. It is now almost 8 months since the interview and the situation has caused me hardship. I was wondering if anyone out there is familiar with new policy that may affect a person's ability to file. Here are some links:

http://www.visalaw.com/06jun1/13jun106.html

http://www.murthy.com/news/n_delcer.html

They seem to indicate that the government is "trying" to limit such lawsuits. The wording is confusing to me and I am trying to understand whether I should go forward in filing a "writ of mandamus".

Since my interview took place, I have written several letters to USCIS asking for status of my name check. I have also enlisted assistance of Congressman's assistant in my district of Northern Texas. She has been sending inquiries to FBI via FAX and has only received one response in June stating that my name check investigation began last August, 2005 and that FBI could not predict when the investigation would be complete.

For whatever its worth ... I am a woman of Canadian origin. My last name is a very common German name and my first name is a very common French name. I was born and grew up in one city in Canada and have lived for 25 years in the US as a law-abiding, tax-paying resident. I feel really sympathetic to all the Middle-Eastern and East Indian men who seem to be most affected by the FBI name check program. I hope its okay for me to express that I think the FBI name check program is deeply flawed and the process is very vulnerable to all sorts of data corruption.

Mostly I am wondering if I should file the lawsuit and whether new policies will prevent my ability to resolve my own pending application.


why...why...why do people have to bring indians in between.... someone includes indians with arabs...wether it is a person in uscis or a stray person like ur selves....we dont call all europeans as brits or russians.. so why cant the people educate themselves?
cant u guys follow mencia....????
http://carlosmencia.com/content/videos.php?id=17
indians are not arabs...high time ppl realise this and educate themselves...we r bapidi bapidi not kholulu...gawd!

just kidding...u r going to sail through dont worry!!

best of luck
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That video was really funny. Thank you. I apologise if I came across unPC. I'm obviously annoyed by my own predicament and we all have to agree that I don't fit the "stereotype" person who gets caught in the name check. I don't like categorizing people by their ethnic origins ... and I guess if I tried to I'd get it all wrong anyways.
Why can't we all dance around the planet like that Matt Harding guy ... another funny video ... http://www.wherethehellismatt.com/
Thanks again for feedback.
 
GreenCardVirus said:
What region do East Indian men come from? Is it eastern part of India or it is Bangladesh.
eastern india fyi is predominantly christian and buddhists...not hindu nor muslims...(mizoram/sikkim/arunachal pradesh)

now if r talking of bangladesh(east pakistan)...
 
Top