New Delhi Visa numbers - INDIA EB3 MAY 2001: A hint or typo ?

Maybe ...

Rose101 said:

Rose101,

Although I wouldn't trust the embassy in New Delhi (they have posted wrong info before) it is not improbable that India EB3 advnaces to May 1 2001. That is where almost all EB3 categories are stuck and India will also probably get stuck there. Hence there is no need for excitement for those that are past May 01. It may be good news for March-April 2001 PDs.

Lets wait for the formal bulletin for the real dates.

saras
 
Not again.

It seems that the "Iraqi Minister" works for New Delhi. I simply ignore everything the post there.

saras76 said:
Rose101,

Although I wouldn't trust the embassy in New Delhi (they have posted wrong info before) it is not improbable that India EB3 advnaces to May 1 2001. That is where almost all EB3 categories are stuck and India will also probably get stuck there. Hence there is no need for excitement for those that are past May 01. It may be good news for March-April 2001 PDs.

Lets wait for the formal bulletin for the real dates.

saras
 
saras76

Yes. I understand. I wish priority dates could move past May 2001 but I know it is highly unlikeley. If May'01, I assume it is a grinding halt......

Thanks

saras76 said:
Rose101,

Although I wouldn't trust the embassy in New Delhi (they have posted wrong info before) it is not improbable that India EB3 advnaces to May 1 2001. That is where almost all EB3 categories are stuck and India will also probably get stuck there. Hence there is no need for excitement for those that are past May 01. It may be good news for March-April 2001 PDs.

Lets wait for the formal bulletin for the real dates.

saras
 
Although the cut-off dates is so negative that it follows the same pattern we have observed. EB3 world continues stuck.

Rose101 said:
saras76

Yes. I understand. I wish priority dates could move past May 2001 but I know it is highly unlikeley. If May'01, I assume it is a grinding halt......

Thanks
 
Well, that bulletin is for May and it defintely is a typo. If it was for June, then maybe they released the information earlier.
 
Is it even supposed to mean anything?! Sounds like brainless rambling.
marlon2006 said:
It seems that the "Iraqi Minister" works for New Delhi. I simply ignore everything the post there.
 
Top