Namecheck/Response from L. Bush Office

vsem-privet

Registered Users (C)
I received the other day a letter card from L. Bush's office (see text below) in response to my request two months ago to intercede on my behalf with USCIS/FBI about my delayed namecheck (18 months since interview). Has anyone else who's written to that office received a similar letter card? Is this to be taken as a genuine response that may elicit some action or just a generic write-off?

_____________________

The White House
Washington

On behalf of Mrs. Bush, I would like to thank you for your letter. I have shared your information with members of the White House staff who work directly with the agency that has jurisdiction over your issue. The appropriate agency wil review your correspondence and be in touch with you directly.

Mrs. Bush appreciates your taking the time to write and hopes the circumstances you face will be resolved soon.

Sincerely,

Misty Marshall
Director of Correspondence
Office of the First Lady
 
vsem-privet said:
I received the other day a letter card from L. Bush's office (see text below) in response to my request two months ago to intercede on my behalf with USCIS/FBI about my delayed namecheck (18 months since interview). Has anyone else who's written to that office received a similar letter card? Is this to be taken as a genuine response that may elicit some action or just a generic write-off?

_____________________

The White House
Washington

On behalf of Mrs. Bush, I would like to thank you for your letter. I have shared your information with members of the White House staff who work directly with the agency that has jurisdiction over your issue. The appropriate agency wil review your correspondence and be in touch with you directly.

Mrs. Bush appreciates your taking the time to write and hopes the circumstances you face will be resolved soon.

Sincerely,

Misty Marshall
Director of Correspondence
Office of the First Lady

Who knows? But at least you got a nice card. Best of luck with your case - who knows, maybe it landed on the right person's desk.
 
Why don't we all, who's stuck in name check process, write to the White House. Maybe that would make them finally do something about the huge backlog...
 
vsem-privet said:
I received the other day a letter card from L. Bush's office (see text below) in response to my request two months ago to intercede on my behalf with USCIS/FBI about my delayed namecheck (18 months since interview). Has anyone else who's written to that office received a similar letter card? Is this to be taken as a genuine response that may elicit some action or just a generic write-off?

_____________________

The White House
Washington

On behalf of Mrs. Bush, I would like to thank you for your letter. I have shared your information with members of the White House staff who work directly with the agency that has jurisdiction over your issue. The appropriate agency wil review your correspondence and be in touch with you directly.

Mrs. Bush appreciates your taking the time to write and hopes the circumstances you face will be resolved soon.

Sincerely,

Misty Marshall
Director of Correspondence
Office of the First Lady


Can u please share more information about your request?
Like where did u send the letter to and whom did u address ur letter too.
 
tapskap said:
Can u please share more information about your request?
Like where did u send the letter to and whom did u address ur letter too.

Letter sent to White House addressed to Laura Bush. Reply received two months after sending. A number of people at this forum stuck in namecheck write to the White House, among other places. In my personal judgment, it's prudent to wait at least a year from the biometrics appointment (a date soon after which the namecheck should typically initiate) to start involving outside agencies and/or people.
 
vsem-privet said:
In my personal judgment, it's prudent to wait at least a year from the biometrics appointment (a date soon after which the namecheck should typically initiate) to start involving outside agencies and/or people.
Of course. I agree.
 
vsem-privet said:
I received the other day a letter card from L. Bush's office (see text below) in response to my request two months ago to intercede on my behalf with USCIS/FBI about my delayed namecheck (18 months since interview). Has anyone else who's written to that office received a similar letter card? Is this to be taken as a genuine response that may elicit some action or just a generic write-off?

_____________________

The White House
Washington

On behalf of Mrs. Bush, I would like to thank you for your letter. I have shared your information with members of the White House staff who work directly with the agency that has jurisdiction over your issue. The appropriate agency wil review your correspondence and be in touch with you directly.

Mrs. Bush appreciates your taking the time to write and hopes the circumstances you face will be resolved soon.

Sincerely,

Misty Marshall
Director of Correspondence
Office of the First Lady
Looks pretty generic to me. There is no mention of FBI or name check in the response. She just mentioned "staff who work directly with the agency that has jurisdiction over your issue". There is no personal touch even after waiting for 2 months.
 
EricNeesGC said:
Looks pretty generic to me. There is no mention of FBI or name check in the response. She just mentioned "staff who work directly with the agency that has jurisdiction over your issue". There is no personal touch even after waiting for 2 months.

The format of the response is indeed generic. However, as soon as I've posted my initial message, I searched this forum and found that some users received a similar letter card from that office and three weeks later a reply from FBI.
 
Update

Curiously enough, today the day after receiving a letter card from L. Bush's office, I found in my mailbox another letter from the FBI Namecheck Program Office, saying that they have been forwarded my correspondence from L. Bush's office and that--here's a bummer--my request is still "currently in a pending status." The end of the letter reads: " While an exact date for completion of this review cannot be given, you may be assured that the results will be made available to the immigration authorities as quickly as possible." I'm very disappointed, to say the least, thinking all along that the whole rigmarole is due to an administrative mishap (e.g. miscommunication between USCIS and FBI offices) rather than an actual hit that requires review and clearance by an actual agent. Any advice on further options?
 
I don't think it's the miscommunication... If they had the results they would have sent it immidiately.
My understanding is that if they don't get a hit, then the name is cleared in a very short time. If there is a delay, then there was a hit. And, it takes long because of the huge backlog. Hopefully, now they will expedite your case just to be able to report the White House that their request was satisfied.
Good luck! Keep us posted!
 
Do you guys have any idea what decision leads some people to be stuck in name check forever? I just got my approval and what I feared the most was being in taht situation. Is it based on how common or uncommon your name is? just curious...
 
Dry Reading

I know these reports are "boring", but very eye-opening. This is from the overseer's report issued last month regarding Name Checks. It bears reading.. sorry for the length of it ! At the very least, write to the Ombudsman, whose email is included below ! :o

The FBI provides information to USCIS as a paying customer on anyone who is the principal subject of an investigation or is a person referenced in a file. USCIS adjudicators and the Fraud Detection and National Security (FDNS) unit use this information to determine if applicants are ineligible for benefits. The name checks are not sought by the FBI as part of ongoing investigations or from a need to learn more about an individual because of any threat or risk perceived by the FBI. Instead, the name checks are a fee-for-service that the FBI provides to USCIS at its request. Moreover, the FBI does not record any additional information about the names USCIS submits and does not routinely take any further action. Instead, the FBI reviews its files much like a credit reporting entity would verify and report on information to commercial entities requesting credit validations.

Some types of background and security checks return results within a few days and do not significantly prolong USCIS processing times or hinder backlog reduction goals. However, while the overall percentage of long-pending cases is small, as of May 2006, USCIS reported 235,802 FBI name checks pending, with approximately 65 percent (153,166) of those cases pending more than 90 days and approximately 35 percent (82,824) pending more than one year.

In November 2005, based on earlier data, the DHS IG reported that FBI name checks take more than a month to complete for six percent of submissions and more than six months to complete for one percent of submissions. The longer time is required because the FBI must conduct a manual review of its files to verify that the applicant is actually the subject of an FBI file. This review can include the FBI reporting on fragments of names on people who are not necessarily central or directly related to a case.

USCIS has limited capability to produce reports detailing the status of long-pending FBI name check cases. In addition, USCIS systems do not automatically indicate when a delayed name check is complete and the case can be adjudicated. Often, this leads to a situation where the validity of other checks expire before USCIS reviews the case. Those checks then need to be reinitiated, adding financial and time costs for applicants and USCIS. The high volume of FBI name check cases and the relatively limited resources devoted to background and security checks are major problems. The FBI’s manual processing exacerbates delays. USCIS’ planned Background Check Service (BCS), a new IT system that will track the status of background and security checks for pending cases, needs to be implemented as soon as possible. The Ombudsman looks forward to more information from USCIS on the BCS implementation schedule.

Considering the cost and inconveniences caused by the delays, the value of the FBI name check process should be reexamined. In almost every name check case that the FBI conducts for USCIS, the foreign national is physically present in the United States during the name check process. Thus, delays in the name check process actually prolong an individual’s presence (albeit in an interim status) in the United States while the check is pending. In that sense, the current USCIS name check policy may increase the risk to national security by prolonging the time a potential criminal or terrorist remains in the country. Further, checks do not differentiate whether the individual has been in the United States for many years or a few days, is from and/or has traveled frequently to a country designated as a State Sponsor of Terrorism, or is a member of the U.S. military. Most individuals subject to lengthy name checks are either already green card holders or have been issued EADs allowing them to receive Social Security cards and state drivers’ licenses. Additionally, most green card applicants are also eligible to receive advance parole to enable them to travel outside the United States and return as long as their cases are pending, which can be for years under the current process.

USCIS requires that the FBI name check be completed before issuing a green card. However, in removal proceedings before an Immigration Judge, the judge will require confirmation of all background and security checks by DHS before the judge can grant any relief (for example, ordering USCIS to issue a green card). Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE – another DHS agency) attorneys indicate to the judge that all background and security checks have been initiated. The judge proceeds with issuing an order which grants green card status to the individual. Based on this order, USCIS, as the producer of the actual card, must issue the green card despite the outstanding FBI name check. These two policies need to be harmonized.

email: cisombudsman@dhs.gov

Unfortunately, the process is not working and consideration should be given to re-engineering it to include a risk-based approach to immigration screening and national security.

June 2006 www.dhs.gov/cisombudsman
email: cisombudsman@dhs.gov
 
Top