takeiteasy
Registered Users (C)
why everybody is so calm and quiet?? comeon guys cheerup!! things will be
real good in coming weeks......
takeiteasy
real good in coming weeks......
takeiteasy
Looks like this place is calm and quiet???????????
- Thread starter takeiteasy
- Start date
Mishonio ABC
Registered Users (C)
No Title
Are you sure?
Are you sure?
No Title
Ciba, Can we do anything to get CSC moving now.... I had a questions,
If a person with similar situation got his I-485 approval in 4 months then I should be eligible to get the same in 4 months. Isnt it straight forward discrimination. What do you think, can a person file a lawsuit against INS on this.
Thanks
Ciba, Can we do anything to get CSC moving now.... I had a questions,
If a person with similar situation got his I-485 approval in 4 months then I should be eligible to get the same in 4 months. Isnt it straight forward discrimination. What do you think, can a person file a lawsuit against INS on this.
Thanks
No Title
Depressing piece from Ron Gotcher: 80,000 backlog cases for AOS to be cleaned up
( - i will tighten my seatbelt and wait... good luck to all...
----from Ron Gotcher\'s post-------
That is the question that no one can answer. Back before the INS stopped processing AOS applications entirely (March - December, 1999), the CSC was running a backlog of about two to two and a half years. During the processing halt, a very large number of cases piled up in the backlog.
When processing resumed in early 2000, the CSC began processing very recently filed cases. There were a number of reasons for this. Since then, they seem to have continued to process the more recently filed cases, while ignoring those that were on file when the processing stopped back in 1999.
They have taken a lot of criticism for this and have been sued several times. A month ago, their "Just in Time Report" showed that the cases that they were processing in May had been filed in December of last year. This did not mean that they had processed all of the cases filed before December of last year, only that those were the cases they were processing in May. The current JIT report shows that they are processing cases filed in January 1998.
It appears that they may have decided to go back and clean up their backlog before processing additional recently filed cases. If so, this would mean that they are now working through the inventory of approximately 80,000 pending AOS cases.
Depressing piece from Ron Gotcher: 80,000 backlog cases for AOS to be cleaned up
( - i will tighten my seatbelt and wait... good luck to all...----from Ron Gotcher\'s post-------
That is the question that no one can answer. Back before the INS stopped processing AOS applications entirely (March - December, 1999), the CSC was running a backlog of about two to two and a half years. During the processing halt, a very large number of cases piled up in the backlog.
When processing resumed in early 2000, the CSC began processing very recently filed cases. There were a number of reasons for this. Since then, they seem to have continued to process the more recently filed cases, while ignoring those that were on file when the processing stopped back in 1999.
They have taken a lot of criticism for this and have been sued several times. A month ago, their "Just in Time Report" showed that the cases that they were processing in May had been filed in December of last year. This did not mean that they had processed all of the cases filed before December of last year, only that those were the cases they were processing in May. The current JIT report shows that they are processing cases filed in January 1998.
It appears that they may have decided to go back and clean up their backlog before processing additional recently filed cases. If so, this would mean that they are now working through the inventory of approximately 80,000 pending AOS cases.
No Title
AN I think this is bullshit from lawyer....80000 pending cases !! what is that ?? Lets say all 97 ND has been approved........Lets assume complete 1998/1999 and some 2000 cases are pending....assuming about 500 working days for about 2 years each day 80000/500 = 160 485 petitions were filed in those pending years !! I think this is crap !!
AN I think this is bullshit from lawyer....80000 pending cases !! what is that ?? Lets say all 97 ND has been approved........Lets assume complete 1998/1999 and some 2000 cases are pending....assuming about 500 working days for about 2 years each day 80000/500 = 160 485 petitions were filed in those pending years !! I think this is crap !!